Skip to main content

Rollover and Turnover Fixtures for Large, Heavy Assemblies

A rollover or turnover fixture turns a large, heavy assembly through 90° or 180° under control, so that its other faces can be welded, machined, assembled, or inspected without an improvised flip on crane hooks or forklift tines. UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for aerospace and heavy industry from its Spokane Valley, WA facility, integrating Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control with in-house CNC machining, heat treating, and stress relief. This article covers how the combined center of gravity moves during a turnover, how ring-type fixtures and two-crane turnovers carry the load, how the hook loads shift between two cranes, what the lift plan and the governing standards require, and what drives, sensing, and PLC logic a powered rollover needs. A rollover fixture is built along the same chain as any heavy handling system, design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring, and the pivot location chosen at the design link sets the torque that the drives and brakes at the far end must control.

What is a rollover or turnover fixture, and why not turn the part by crane alone?​

A rollover (or turnover) fixture is a dedicated frame that grips a large assembly and rotates it about a defined pivot, through 90° to stand it up or through 180° to turn it face-down. The parts that need one are those too large, too heavy, or turned too often to re-rig each time: a launch-vehicle barrel or dome section and a satellite primary structure in aerospace, a combat-vehicle hull in defense, a hull block in a shipyard, a turbine runner or stay-ring segment in hydro power, a grinding-mill head in mining, a module frame or vessel skirt in oil and gas, and a large telescope or instrument structure at a research observatory. A positioner holds a part for continuous work at any angle; a rollover exists to change the face the part rests on, which may happen only once or twice per build.

The alternative is an improvised flip: lifting one edge, tipping the part on its opposite edge, and catching it as it goes over. An OSHA accident record describes one such flip. Two workers were turning over a fabricated metal staircase frame, with forklift tines inserted into the frame, when a corner shifted; the helper lunged forward and tried to catch the shifted side, and his index and middle fingers were crushed, resulting in the need for amputation. An improvised turnover has no fixed pivot, no control of the load as it passes its balance point, and people's hands in the pinch zone. A fixture replaces all three with a defined axis, a drive and brake, and a guarded zone.

Where the part stays in one orientation for long periods of work rather than being turned once, the architectures in the comparison of headstock-tailstock, trunnion, and turntable positioners are the alternative to weigh against a rollover (OSHA Accident Summary 106789.015).

How does the center of gravity move as a large assembly is turned over?​

The combined center of gravity (CG) of part and fixture is the weight-averaged position of the individual CGs, x̄ = Σx̄ᵢWᵢ ÷ ΣWᵢ, and the fixture's frame, clamps, and any counterweight count as parts. A positioner is arranged, where the design allows, so that its axis passes near that CG. A turnover about an edge or a low pivot is not: when an assembly is tipped about an edge or a pivot below it, gravity produces a moment about the pivot equal to the weight times the horizontal distance from pivot to CG, M = W × d⊥, and that distance shrinks to zero and then changes sign as the CG passes over the pivot.

An illustrative case, with every input an assumption, shows the size of the effect. A 40,000 lb welded module has its CG 48 in in from the tipping edge and 36 in above the base, and it is rotated 90° about that edge onto its adjacent face:

  • At the start, the horizontal distance from edge to CG is 48 in, so the moment that must be overcome is 40,000 × 48 = 1,920,000 lb·in (160,000 lb·ft).
  • The CG sits √(48² + 36²) = 60 in from the edge, so it passes directly over the edge after a rotation of tan⁻¹(48 ÷ 36) = 53.1°.
  • Beyond 53.1°, the moment reverses. The part no longer has to be lifted; it tries to fall onto its new face, and at the 90° landing the moment is 40,000 × 36 = 1,440,000 lb·in (120,000 lb·ft).

Whatever was lifting the part becomes a brake at the over-center point. One failure mode is a part that runs away over center and lands hard; another is a tipping edge that slides instead of pivoting. Both are engineering reasoning from the statics, not cited findings. For any body that can either slip or tip, the limiting load is found for each mode, and the mode reached at the smaller load governs; a pull that is not vertical adds a horizontal force at the edge, so the edge is chocked or pinned rather than left to friction (Baker and Haynes 2026, §4.1 eq. 4.1.1, §7.2 eq. 7.2.2, and §9.2).

How does a ring-type rollover keep the pivot near the center of gravity?​

A ring-type rollover clamps the assembly inside two or more circular rings and turns the rings on powered rollers set in a floor frame. The rotation axis is the ring center, so the designer can place the pivot at, or close to, the combined CG, the opposite of the edge pivot above. With the CG on the ring axis, the drive overcomes only rolling friction. With the CG a distance e off the axis, the drive must supply a peak torque W × e, and the driven rollers deliver it as a tangential force at the ring radius R, F = W × e ÷ R.

Illustrative numbers, again all assumptions: a 60,000 lb assembly in 144 in diameter rings (R = 72 in), each ring carried on two rollers set 30° either side of bottom center.

  • With the CG 4 in off the ring axis, the peak drive torque is 60,000 × 4 = 240,000 lb·in (20,000 lb·ft), and the tangential force needed at the rings is 240,000 ÷ 72 = 3,333 lb.
  • With the CG on the axis, each roller position carries W ÷ (2 cos 30°) = 34,641 lb, or 17,321 lb per roller on a two-ring fixture; an offset CG loads one side more than the other.
  • Turned about an edge 48 in from its CG instead, the same assembly would need up to 60,000 × 48 = 2,880,000 lb·in, 12 times the ring figure.

The rollers drive the rings by friction, so a ring rollover has its own slip-or-tip question. The driven rollers can transmit tangential force only up to the friction available at their normal load, and if the out-of-balance moment demands more, the rings slip and the load rolls back toward its low point. This traction limit is engineering reasoning from the slip-or-tip method, not a cited rule. The friction coefficient for the ring and roller materials comes from component data and is not assumed here. Where the CG offset cannot be kept small across the part family, a geared ring, a chain wrap, or a positive stop at each index angle removes the traction limit (Baker and Haynes 2026, §4.1 eq. 4.1.1 and §9.2).

How do the hook loads shift between two cranes during a tandem turnover?​

When no fixture exists, or the part is too large for one, two cranes can upend it: a lead crane lifts one end while a tailing crane holds the other end clear of the floor, and the part rotates from horizontal toward vertical between them. No source cited here quantifies how the hook loads move during that operation, so what follows is an illustrative statics calculation, not a rule, and every input is an assumption.

A 40,000 lb weldment 480 in long has its CG at mid-length, a = 240 in from the tailing lug, and its lifting lugs on its top face, so the line through the two lugs sits c = 24 in above the CG. With plumb hoist lines and the part inclined at angle β from horizontal, taking moments about the tailing lug gives:

  • T_lead = W × (a ÷ L + (c ÷ L) × tan β), and T_tail = W − T_lead
  • β = 0°: 20,000 lb lead, 20,000 lb tail
  • β = 30°: 21,155 lb lead, 18,845 lb tail
  • β = 60°: 23,464 lb lead, 16,536 lb tail
  • β = 80°: 31,343 lb lead, 8,657 lb tail
  • β = 84.3°, where tan β = 10: 40,000 lb lead, 0 lb tail

Three lessons follow. The lead crane ends up carrying the whole weight once the part hangs vertical, so it is selected for W, not W ÷ 2; a crane chosen for half the load is already 57 percent over that figure at 80°. The tailing line goes slack at 84.3°, before the part is vertical, and the bottom end then swings under the lead hook, an unplanned load transfer. And the shift comes from the lug geometry, not the weight: with the lugs on the CG line (c = 0), the split stays at 20,000 lb each until the part is vertical, and with the lugs below the CG the tailing crane gains load instead. Out-of-plumb lines, crane travel, differences in hoist speed or reeving between the two cranes, and dynamic effects add to these static numbers.

This calculation belongs with the rigging sketches or descriptions that DOE's critical-lift procedure calls for, which include, as applicable, load vectors, lifting points, and sling angles. A shipyard's two-crane turnover of a hull block also falls under shipyard crane rules, set out in the article on handling hull blocks, propellers, and propulsion shafts (Baker and Haynes 2026, §4.1 eq. 4.1.1; DOE-STD-1090-2020, §2.2.3 C).

What must a turnover lift plan identify, and when is it a critical lift?​

A turnover is one of the lifts that planning documents single out. The U.S. Department of Energy's hoisting and rigging standard is a technical standard that is not mandated for use at DOE sites; a site or program office may use it as a contract document or as a best-practice guide. Its ordinary-lift and critical-lift sections include these planning steps:

  • Identify the load. Before the lift, identify its weight, dimensions, CG, and ability to support the imposed lifting forces at the load and at each lift point. For an ordinary lift the lift director ensures these are addressed as applicable; a critical-lift plan must include them.
  • Write the plan down where the CG may relocate during the lift, where the load is transferred in mid-air from one lifting device to another, or where more than one lifting device shares the load. These are three of the conditions the standard lists for an ordinary lift that requires special consideration. A tandem upend meets at least the multiple-lifting-device condition.
  • Classify it as critical if any of the standard's critical-lift conditions is met. Two that a turnover can meet are an item that is unique, would be irreplaceable or not repairable if damaged, and is vital to a system, facility, or project operation, and an item whose replacement or repair cost, or the operational delay its damage would cause, would have a negative impact on facility, organizational, or DOE budgets to the extent that it would affect program commitments. A one-of-a-kind flight structure or a finished turbine runner can be that case.
  • Run a practice lift where the critical-lift procedure requires one. Its conditions should closely simulate the actual weight, rigging, and load path.
  • Keep the hook over the CG. The lift director keeps the load hook directly over the CG as far as possible and re-rigs if the lines are not plumb once they take a strain.

DOE's standard points to ASME P30.1 for lift planning; the 2024 edition's split into a Standard Lift Plan and a Critical Lift Plan is covered in Positioning Cranes vs. Standard Overhead Cranes for Precision Lifts.

OSHA's construction crane rule, 29 CFR 1926.1432, requires a lift in which more than one crane supports the load to be planned by a qualified person, with engineering expertise where that person decides it is needed, and to be directed by a lift director who reviews the plan in a meeting with all workers who will be involved with the operation. A plant-floor turnover with overhead cranes falls under OSHA's general-industry overhead crane rule, 29 CFR 1910.179, instead, so in a plant those steps are good practice rather than a requirement (DOE-STD-1090-2020, §1.2.12, §1.3.3.1, §1.3.4.1, §2.1.2 B–C, and §2.2.11; ASME P30.1-2024; OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1432, paragraphs a and b; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016).

How do NASA and Navy lifting programs treat an offset-CG turnover?​

Aerospace and defense sites can work under their agency's lifting program, and those programs classify several conditions that a turnover creates. NASA's lifting standard defines a NASA Technical lift as a non-critical complex lifting operation that requires additional planning and precautions, such as written procedures, to perform the lift reliably. Its examples may include, but are not limited to, irregular loads or loads with unusual weight distribution (offset CG) and lifts that involve multiple lifting devices or tandem lifts. It classifies lifts that involve a lift point below the CG as NASA Critical lifts, and it classifies lifts of high-value flight hardware as NASA Critical lifts; programs and projects must designate as critical all lifts that involve programmatic high-value, one-of-a-kind flight hardware or that have adverse programmatic impacts. A turnover lift of a flight structure whose lift point is below its CG is therefore a NASA Critical lift.

NASA's ground support equipment standard, NASA-STD-5005D, gives minimum factors of safety for support structures, to be used when not otherwise specified, and excludes lifting devices and equipment from them. It sends the design and certification of lifting devices, and their load testing, to NASA's lifting standard, NASA-STD-8719.9, now issued as NASA-STD-8719.9C. In UTEC's reading, a rollover fixture that is also lifted by crane with the part in it is therefore designed to the lifting standard's rules, not only to the ground-support rules.

The Navy's weight handling program manual, NAVFAC P-307, calls for a pre-lift brief that discusses, as applicable, load weights and the CG, and it notes that ASME P30.1 provides additional information. In all three documents the CG comes up before the part moves: DOE's planning identifies it, NASA's lift classes name offset-CG and below-CG lifts, and the Navy's brief discusses it. These are agency practices, not universal legal requirements, but a fixture supplier serving those sites should build its documentation to meet them (NASA-STD-8719.9C, §3.2, §4.2.2, and §4.2.5; NASA-STD-5005D 2013, §4.6.2.1.b, §5.1.2.a, and §5.2.7; NAVFAC P-307 2025, §10.5).

Which equipment standards apply to a rollover fixture, and which do not?​

The standard that sounds closest does not apply to a full rollover. MHI's safety standard for industrial tilters, ANSI MH29.2-2020, excludes invertors and rotators and excludes dumpers and upenders whose angular travel exceeds 110°. A 180° rollover or turnover fixture therefore falls outside MH29.2, and a specification should not cite it as the governing standard; a limited-travel upender of 90° is the case to check against it.

Two other groups of rules do apply, depending on how the fixture is used:

  • When the fixture is lifted. A fixture that is picked up by crane with the part clamped in it is a below-the-hook lifting device while it hangs. ASME BTH-1-2023 is the design standard for below-the-hook lifting devices. ASME B30.20-2025, in its publisher's scope statement, includes provisions for the marking, construction, installation, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation of below-the-hook lifting devices used for attaching loads to a hoist, other than components addressed by other ASME B30 volumes or other standards, and its requirements also apply to clamps used for positioning and anchoring. The positioner comparison sets out why a fixture designed only for its floor case needs its lugs and pick points checked for the lift.
  • When the fixture is a floor machine. A powered ring rollover is a machine. OSHA's general machine rule, 29 CFR 1910.212, requires guarding to protect the operator and others in the machine area from hazards such as ingoing nip points and rotating parts, and the point where a ring meets its driven roller is an ingoing nip point. The same rule requires machines designed for a fixed location to be securely anchored to prevent walking or moving. ISO 12100:2010 specifies principles of risk assessment and risk reduction to help designers achieve safety in the design of machinery, and that assessment identifies which guards and safety functions the fixture needs.

A fixture that is both lifted and floor-mounted meets both sets of rules (MHI ANSI MH29.2-2020; ASME BTH-1-2023; ASME B30.20-2025; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.212-1974, paragraphs a.1 and b; ISO 12100:2010).

How is the fixture structure designed for a load that reverses as it turns?​

On a turntable positioner the part's weight bears on the same table at every angle. In a 180° turnover, each clamp, pad, and lug sees its load swing from bearing through shear to tension: a clamp that only held the part down at the start is hanging it at the end. Every clamp is therefore a load-path item, designed for the full share of the weight in tension, and its failure mode is not a slow creep but a part released at mid-rotation.

The part's structure matters too. DOE's rigging standard notes that rigging imposes loads in the lifted item and that the item must be able to resist them as configured. A fixture that clamps a thin skin, an unstiffened panel, or a machined sealing face can dent or distort the part it was built to protect, so pads bear on hard points, frames, or dedicated lifting features.

Repeat use turns this into a fatigue problem. A fixture that turns four parts per shift, over and back, on two shifts for 250 days completes 4 × 2 × 2 × 250 = 4,000 full load reversals a year, and the clamp and ring welds see each one. AWS D14.4/D14.4M:2019 is the specification for the design of welded joints in machinery and equipment and is the reference for those weld details. The rings' rolling surfaces must stay round and the roller paths aligned, so the welded frame is stress-relieved before its final machining. UTEC Industrial stress-relieves and machines the welded frames of heavy handling equipment in-house before assembly, and stress relief for machine bases and frames covers the thermal and vibratory methods.

The reversing clamp load and the reversal count together set the weld details, so the fixture's duty belongs in its specification (DOE-STD-1090-2020, §1.2.12.1; AWS D14.4/D14.4M:2019).

How are the drives and brakes sized to control the load over center?​

The over-center point sets the drive's hardest job. In the edge-pivot example above, the drive lifts against 1,920,000 lb·in at the start and, past 53.1°, lowers against up to 1,440,000 lb·in. Past that point the load drives the motor, so the drive must absorb the regenerated energy and the brake must hold the full lowering moment at any angle where the motion may stop. This is engineering reasoning from the statics above, not a cited rule.

Output power follows from P = T × ω, and the pivot location dominates it:

  • Edge pivot, 90° in 2 minutes: ω = (π ÷ 2) ÷ 120 = 0.0131 rad/s, so P = 1,920,000 × 0.0131 = 25,133 lb·in/s, or 2,094 ft·lb/s and 3.8 hp at the output.
  • Ring rollover, 180° in 2 minutes: ω = π ÷ 120 = 0.0262 rad/s, so P = 240,000 × 0.0262 = 6,283 lb·in/s, or 524 ft·lb/s and 0.95 hp at the output.

These are outputs before gear efficiency, friction, and service factor. The reducer is rated as an industrial enclosed gear drive under ANSI/AGMA 6013-B16, and open gearing on a ring is rated for tooth pitting and bending under ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04. The brake check through the train in the back-driving direction follows the method in sizing a positioner.

A part stopped at mid-rotation and held by its brake is stored gravity energy. OSHA's lockout rule states that push buttons, selector switches, and other control-circuit-type devices are not energy-isolating devices, so before anyone works under or inside a turned part it is lowered to a rest position, blocked, or pinned (ANSI/AGMA 6013-B16; ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147-1989).

What sensing, interlocks, and PLC logic does a powered rollover need?​

Each failure mode above has a sensing or interlock counterpart, and the controls are what make a rollover repeatable:

  • Angle feedback. An absolute encoder on the pivot or ring reports the rotation angle at power-up, so a part stopped mid-turn is never homed blind. Hardwired limit switches back up the software limits at each end of travel.
  • Over-center logic. The PLC holds each part number's over-center angle, 53.1° in the edge-pivot example, and slows the axis before it, so the change from lifting to braking happens at low speed.
  • Clamp proof. A switch or pressure signal proves every clamp closed before rotation is permitted, and clamp release is allowed only at a rest angle.
  • Traction and load checks. On a ring rollover, comparing the roller motor's encoder with the ring's own encoder detects ring slip. Drive torque plotted against angle is compared with the expected W × d⊥ curve, so a heavier or off-center part shows up before the over-center point.
  • Tandem-lift load sharing. Where two cranes turn a part, load cells at each hook let the controller compare the measured split with the planned T_lead(β) curve and stop the lift when they diverge.
  • Drives and safety functions. Allen-Bradley Kinetix 5700 servo drives support DSL and Hiperface encoder feedback, offer position-loop, velocity-loop, and torque-loop axis configurations with a current regulator loop, and feature a safe torque-off function. Rockwell Automation's controller design manual says tasks can be configured as continuous, periodic, or event, and that a periodic task performs a function at a specific time interval, so interlocks can run at a fixed period. ISO 13849-1:2023 specifies a methodology for the design and integration of safety-related parts of control systems that perform safety functions, and applies to high-demand and continuous modes of operation. IEC 60204-1:2016 applies to the electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic equipment of machines not portable by hand while working.

UTEC Industrial, a Rockwell Automation Recognized System Integrator, builds Allen-Bradley ControlLogix and CompactLogix control, VFD and servo drives, and UL 508A panels into the handling equipment it fabricates.

The sensors verify at every turn the two assumptions the design rests on, the part's weight and its CG (Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, Kinetix 5700; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025, Ch. 5 pp. 39 and 41; ISO 13849-1:2023; IEC 60204-1:2016).

How is a rollover fixture proof-tested, commissioned, and monitored?​

A rollover is proven with load, not by observation. NASA's lifting standard calls for a proof load test before first use of all new lifting devices and equipment, before a device returns to service after repairs or modifications that affect its load holding capability or load-bearing components, such as welding on components in the load path, and after wire ropes or load chains are replaced. It sets the proof load for below-the-hook devices by reference to the applicable ASME standard, B30.20 or B30.26. DOE's practice lift, done before the critical lift where the critical-lift procedure requires one, is the operational counterpart: its conditions should closely simulate the actual weight, rigging selection and configuration, load movement path, and other relevant factors; it should be performed by the same crew using the same lifting equipment that will be used in the lift; and the crane or equipment should be operated through its full range of motion before the lift. For a fixture, that means a loaded turn through the full rotation with a representative part or test weight at the largest CG offset the specification allows.

Servo and VFD axes are tuned with that load on. The servo drive manual's commissioning procedure includes a tuning step for each axis, and autotuned loop bandwidths depend on the application and can require adjustment once the motor and load are connected; an axis tuned empty can overshoot at the over-center point, which is the worst place for it. UTEC Industrial performs factory acceptance testing and on-site commissioning, so these loaded tests can be witnessed before the fixture ships and repeated once it is installed.

In service, the commissioning torque-versus-angle curve becomes the baseline. A change in its shape for the same part points to a loosened clamp, a shifted part, or wear in the ring rollers or gearing. Brake holding tests and weld inspections at intervals set by the reversal count complete the monitoring (NASA-STD-8719.9C, §4.5.4 and §13.3.2.5; DOE-STD-1090-2020, §2.2.11; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, Kinetix 5700).

What should a rollover or turnover fixture specification include?​

A rollover request that gives only a weight leaves out most of what sets the design. A useful specification defines:

  • Load envelope: weight range of part and fixture, dimensions, and the CG as a range, with the pivot location relative to it.
  • Motion: rotation angle (90°, 180°, or full turn), rotation time, and the rest angles where clamps may open.
  • Interfaces: clamp and pad locations on hard points, surface protection for finished or flight surfaces, and access for work at each rest angle.
  • Use case: whether the fixture is ever lifted with the part in it, making it a below-the-hook device, and whether the turnover repeats with identical parts.
  • Duty: parts per shift and reversals per year, which set the weld fatigue check.
  • Controls: encoder type, clamp proof, over-center speed limits, guarding and safety functions from the risk assessment, and load sensing for any crane-assisted turn.
  • Acceptance: a loaded test through the full rotation at the maximum CG offset, witnessed at factory acceptance testing.

Repeat use can change who is qualified to make the lift, but it does not remove the planning. DOE's standard defines a pre-engineered production lift as a repetitive lift performed by production line personnel in the assembly or disassembly of components or systems, where detailed lift planning, equipment selection, and lift-specific training may substitute for the personnel qualifications prescribed in the standard's Section 5. Its criteria require the items to be identical in dimensions, weight, CG, load path, method of attachment, and lifting equipment, and liftable to a step-by-step procedure that eliminates rigging decisions or calculations. The detailed planning stays; what the designation relaxes is the Section 5 qualification of the people making the lift. A dedicated fixture helps a repeat turnover meet those criteria because it fixes the method of attachment and the load path; that is engineering reasoning, not a DOE statement. UTEC Industrial has built custom positioning and rotating fixtures for precision assembly and test for RTX.

A fixture specified this way arrives with its CG range, its pivot, and its tests already agreed (DOE-STD-1090-2020, §3.1.2 A–B; ASME BTH-1-2023).

Related Articles

References​

  • OSHA. Employee's Fingers Are Crushed While Turning Over Staircase, Accident Summary No. 106789.015. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
  • Baker, D.W. and Haynes, W. Engineering Statics: Open and Interactive. Colorado State University and Massachusetts Maritime Academy, 2026.
  • DOE-STD-1090-2020: Hoisting and Rigging. U.S. Department of Energy, 2020.
  • ASME P30.1-2024: Planning for Load Handling Activities. ASME, 2024.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1432: Multiple-Crane/Derrick Lifts—Supplemental Requirements. U.S. Department of Labor, 2010.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016: Overhead and Gantry Cranes. U.S. Department of Labor, 2016.
  • NASA-STD-8719.9C: Lifting Standard. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2024.
  • NASA. NASA-STD-5005D w/Change 2: Standard for the Design and Fabrication of Ground Support Equipment. NASA, 2013 (Change 2, 2024).
  • NAVFAC P-307: Weight Handling Program Management. Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, 2025.
  • MHI ANSI MH29.2-2020: Safety Requirements for Industrial Tilters. MHI, 2020.
  • ASME BTH-1-2023: Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices. ASME, 2023.
  • ASME B30.20-2025: Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices. ASME, 2025.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.212-1974: General Requirements for All Machines. U.S. Department of Labor, 1974.
  • ISO 12100:2010: Safety of machinery — General principles for design — Risk assessment and risk reduction. ISO, 2010.
  • AWS D14.4/D14.4M:2019: Specification for the Design of Welded Joints in Machinery and Equipment. AWS, 2019.
  • ANSI/AGMA 6013-B16 (R2021): Standard for Industrial Enclosed Gear Drives. AGMA, 2016.
  • ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04 (R2016): Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur and Helical Gear Teeth. AGMA, 2004.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147-1989: The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 1989.
  • Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018): Kinetix 5700 Servo Drives User Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2018.
  • Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025: Logix 5000 Controllers Design Considerations. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
  • ISO 13849-1:2023: Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems — Part 1: General principles for design. International Organization for Standardization, 2023.
  • IEC 60204-1:2016 (Ed. 6.0): Safety of Machinery -- Electrical Equipment of Machines -- Part 1: General Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2016.

Ready to Discuss a Material Handling System?​

UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for heavy industry, from the stress-relieved structure and drives to the Allen-Bradley PLC controls, tuning, and monitoring that run them, at its Spokane Valley, WA facility. Send UTEC the application, loads, and duty cycle to start a system review.

Request a Quote →

Questions? Call (509) 922-1832 or email sales@utec.co

Last updated on