Skip to main content

Handling Paper Rolls, Reels, and Felts in Pulp and Paper Mills

A pulp and paper mill handles heavy, rotating, continuous-duty loads around the clock: parent reels lifted off the reel, core shafts threaded through rolls, finished rolls conveyed, upended, wrapped, and stacked, and press felts and fabrics changed on a machine that is built to run without stopping. UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for aerospace and heavy industry from its Spokane Valley, WA facility, integrating Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control with in-house CNC machining, heat treating, and stress relief. This article works through paper roll handling from the mill's side: the loads, the OSHA 1910.261 paragraphs that govern reels, winders, core shafts, and finishing rooms, the documented failure modes, and the interlocks, zero-speed checks, and braking stops the equipment needs. Every handling machine in the mill is set along one chain, design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring, so a gap left at the design end reappears as an unguarded nip or an unsafe manual lift on the machine floor.

What does a pulp and paper mill actually have to handle?​

A paper mill's handling problem is set by the product flow from the machine to the shipping dock, and almost every step in it moves a heavy, cylindrical load that can roll, rotate, or drop. The federal pulp and paper standard, 29 CFR 1910.261, applies to establishments where pulp, paper, and paperboard are manufactured and converted, and its machine-room and finishing-room paragraphs name the objects that have to be moved:

  • Reels and reel shafts. The standard treats lifting reels from their bearings as its own hazard under paragraph (k)(24).
  • Winder and rewinder shafts. Paragraph (k)(29) requires a guide rail at the winder to align the shaft for entry into the rewind shaft bearing housings.
  • Core shafts. Paragraph (k)(30) addresses core shafts that weigh in excess of the safe standard while they are removed from a set of paper and placed in the winder's dressing brackets.
  • Finished rolls. Paragraph (l)(9)(iii) requires mechanical lifting devices for placing rolls on and removing them from finishing-room rewinders.

The weights involved are well past anything a person should lift. In one documented OSHA ergonomics case, at a mill that had converted from standard oriented strandboard to an OSB-based siding product with a paper overlay, a single loading task positioned a 3,800 lb roll of paper, inserted a 260 lb, 130 in long roll shaft into it, and used an overhead hoist to place the roll and shaft into the process, and the task was repeated 24 times per day. Loads like these, cycled that often, make roll handling a heavy, continuous-duty equipment problem rather than a rigging task (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraphs k.24, k.29, k.30 and l.9; OSHA Ergonomics Success Story, Paper Roll Loading, 2007).

Which OSHA rules govern roll and reel handling in a paper mill?​

Two layers of federal rules apply. The first is 29 CFR 1910.261, the industry-specific standard, which reaches directly into the handling tasks on the machine and in the finishing room. The second is the general-industry materials-handling and crane rules, which 1910.261 does not replace. Paragraph 1910.261(m), headed "Materials handling," covers only hand trucks, carton-stitching machines, and railroad car unloading, so the cranes, lift trucks, and storage practice around the reels and rolls fall back on 29 CFR 1910 Subpart N and on 1910.179 for overhead and gantry cranes.

The paragraphs a specifying engineer reads first are:

ParagraphRequirementHandling equipment affected
1910.261(b)(1)Padlocks or similar devices for locking out the main disconnect before maintenance, cleaning, adjusting, or servicing that requires close contactEvery powered handling machine
1910.261(k)(1)Emergency stops on paper machines, interlocked with adequate braking action and tested periodicallyReel, drives, and any handling device tied into the machine
1910.261(k)(24)Reels stop rotating before being lifted from bearings; clamps, cables, and slings inspected regularly; square-block reel shaft ends guardedReel cranes and reel lifting devices
1910.261(k)(26)Operator-side nips on drum winders and rewinders guarded by barriers interlocked with the driveWinders and rewinders
1910.261(k)(30)A mechanical device such as a dolly when the core shaft exceeds the safe standardCore shaft handling
1910.261(l)(2)Quick power disconnects interlocked with braking action on all operating sidesFinishing-room machines
1910.261(l)(9)Rewinder barrier guard interlocked against operation above jog speed; zero-speed switch; mechanical lifting devices for rollsFinishing-room rewinders

Paragraph 1910.179(b)(5) then requires the rated load of an overhead crane to be plainly marked on each side of the crane, and Subpart N's 1910.178 governs the lift trucks that carry finished rolls. A handling specification that cites only one layer leaves the other to be discovered during commissioning (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016; OSHA 29 CFR 1910 Subpart N-2019; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016).

How are parent reels lifted off the reel and moved by crane?​

At the dry end of the machine the sheet is wound into a full reel, and that reel has to be lifted from its bearings and carried to the winder while the machine keeps producing the next one. Paragraph 1910.261(k)(24) sets three rules for that move:

  • (k)(24)(i): the reels shall stop rotating before being lifted from bearings.
  • (k)(24)(ii): all lifting equipment, meaning clamps, cables, and slings, shall be maintained in a safe condition and inspected regularly.
  • (k)(24)(iii): reel shafts with square block ends shall be guarded.

The first rule is a sequencing requirement, not a training point. A reel still turning on its bearings carries its rotation into the lift, so the lift has to wait until rotation has stopped, and the most reliable way to guarantee that is a zero-speed signal that the crane or lifting device must see before it is allowed to take load.

The crane itself falls under the general rules. ASME B30.2-2022 covers top-running overhead and gantry cranes, CMAA Specification No. 70-2025 is the specification for multiple-girder top-running bridge and gantry cranes, and the crane's service class is chosen from the mill's own reel weights and lift frequency rather than assumed. OSHA 1910.179(n)(3)(iii)(a) requires care that there is no sudden acceleration or deceleration of the moving load during hoisting, and 1910.179(n)(3)(vii) requires the operator to test the brakes each time a load approaching the rated load is handled, by raising the load a few inches and applying the brakes. A reel crane lifting near capacity on every cycle meets that brake-test condition on every cycle.

The device on the hook, whether a reel spool lifter, a spreader beam, or a C-hook, is a below-the-hook lifting device. Its structural and mechanical design is covered by ASME BTH-1-2023, and its marking, inspection, testing, and operation by ASME B30.20-2025 (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraph k.24; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016; ASME B30.2-2022; CMAA Specification No. 70-2025; ASME BTH-1-2023; ASME B30.20-2025).

Why do reel-spool journals need crack testing?​

Every reel lift loads the spool through its journals, the machined shaft ends that sit in the reel bearings and on the crane's lifting device. A journal that cracks and fractures under a full reel drops the load, so the mill's crane, lifter, and winder unwind stand all depend on journals whose condition is known.

TAPPI treats this as its own subject. TAPPI TIP 0402-34, Paper Machine Reel-Spool Journals: Guidelines for Crack Testing and Repair or Replacement, in its 2023 edition, covers nondestructive testing of reel-spool journals, reel-spool design concepts, journal failures, inspection, and repair or replacement. A mill sets its journal test method and inspection interval against that guideline, separately from the crane's own inspection schedule. The link to the rest of the chain is direct:

  • Parts machining sets the journal diameter, fillet radius, and surface finish, which govern how the journal carries repeated load.
  • Assembly sets how the journal is fitted into the spool.
  • Monitoring means periodic crack testing of the journals, with the results kept as a record that follows the spool.

Paragraph 1910.261(k)(24)(iii) adds a guarding requirement at the same location: reel shafts with square block ends shall be guarded, because the block end is exposed and rotating whenever the reel turns. UTEC Industrial machines shafts and journals to tolerances of ±0.001 in on a 48 in lathe swing and performs NDT and CMM inspection in-house for the handling equipment it builds (TAPPI TIP 0402-34, 2023; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraph k.24.iii).

How are core shafts and spindles inserted without manual lifting?​

Core shaft handling is where paper mills have historically relied on muscle, and the numbers show why that fails. The revised NIOSH lifting equation computes a Recommended Weight Limit as RWL = LC × HM × VM × DM × AM × FM × CM, where the load constant LC is 51 lb and every multiplier is 1.0 or less, so no manual lift can have an RWL above 51 lb. The Lifting Index is LI = load weight ÷ RWL, and NIOSH sets the design goal at an LI of 1.0 or less.

Applied to the 260 lb roll shaft in the OSHA ergonomics case, the best possible result for one worker is:

  • RWL at best = 51 lb, with every multiplier at 1.0
  • LI = 260 lb ÷ 51 lb = 5.1

That is more than five times the design goal before any real-world penalty for reach, height, twisting, or frequency is applied, and the task in that case was repeated 24 times per day. The original method had two people manually inserting the shaft, installing the bungs (end pieces), and pushing the cart under the overhead hoist. The mill's fix was mechanical on both counts:

  • A heavy-duty motorized cart moved the assembled roll, which eliminated the manual pushing.
  • An articulating arm fitted with a custom pneumatically actuated clasp, with built-in safety devices, lifted the shaft by its end and inserted it into the roll.

That is the same direction 1910.261 points. Paragraph (k)(30) requires a mechanical device such as a dolly to carry all or part of the core shaft's weight when the shaft weighs in excess of the safe standard, while it is removed from the set of paper and placed in the winder's dressing brackets. Paragraph (k)(29) requires a guide rail at the winder to align the shaft for easy entrance into the opened rewind shaft bearing housings, so the shaft is guided in rather than steered by hand (Waters et al. 1994; OSHA Ergonomics Success Story, Paper Roll Loading, 2007; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraphs k.29 and k.30).

What handling hazards exist at winders, rewinders, and roll wrappers?​

The finishing end of the mill combines heavy rolls with in-running nips and automatic cycles, and the fatality record shows where it goes wrong:

  • Unguarded roll and conveyor. OSHA's accident record titled Employee Is Killed When Caught by Conveyor Belt and Roll, No. 201331204, filed under the paper-mill industry code, describes an employee caught between a conveyor belt and a paper roll and killed. There was no barrier guard, and the equipment was not locked out.
  • Automatic roll wrapper. In Minnesota FACE Report 03MN039, a maintenance worker troubleshooting a malfunctioning roll wrapper crawled under the wrapper platform and struck a switch. The machine cycled and released a paper roll, and the descending bumper arm crushed him against the wrapper frame. The report recommends entering restricted areas only through interlocking safety doors or gates, shutting down and locking out before entering, and permanent barriers on non-essential openings.

The regulatory answer at winders and rewinders is an interlocked barrier. Paragraph 1910.261(k)(26)(i) requires operator-side nipping points on drum winders and rewinders to be guarded by barrier guards interlocked with the drive mechanism. For finishing-room rewinders, 1910.261(l)(9)(i) requires automatic or manually operated barrier guards of sufficient height to protect anyone working around them, interlocked with the drive mechanism to prevent operation above jog speed without the guard in place, and states that a zero-speed switch should be installed to prevent the guard from being raised while the roll is turning.

The common failure in both incidents is access to a moving or stored-energy hazard without a physical barrier or an isolation step. The design answer is a guarded zone whose only openings are interlocked (OSHA Accident Summary No. 201331204; Minnesota FACE Report 03MN039, 2004; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraphs k.26 and l.9).

How are finished rolls conveyed, upended, and moved by clamp truck?​

Once a roll leaves the winder, it moves through a sequence of machines, each with its own governing document:

  • Roll conveyors and transfers, including the cradles, kickers, and stops that carry rolls to wrapping and storage, fall under ASME B20.1-2024, the safety standard for conveyors and related equipment. The accident record above shows the roll-to-conveyor nip as a caught-between point that has to be guarded.
  • Upenders and downenders that tilt a roll about a horizontal axis, standing it on end for clamp handling or laying it down for a horizontal process, are industrial tilters. MHI's ANSI MH29.2-2020 sets safety requirements for industrial tilters rotated about a horizontal axis, and its scope excludes upenders whose angular travel exceeds 110 degrees.
  • Turntables that rotate a roll for wrapping, labeling, or orientation fall under MHI ANSI MH29.3-2023, the safety requirements for industrial turntables.
  • Clamp trucks, which are lift trucks fitted with a roll-clamp attachment, fall under ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2020, the safety standard for the design, operation, and maintenance of low-lift and high-lift powered industrial trucks.

The OSHA truck rules add three points that matter for roll clamps. Under 1910.178(a)(4), modifications and additions that affect capacity and safe operation shall not be made by the user without the manufacturer's prior written approval, and capacity plates must be changed to match. Under 1910.178(a)(5), when a truck has front-end attachments other than factory-installed ones, the user shall request that the truck be marked to identify the attachment and show the approximate combined weight of truck and attachment at maximum elevation, with the load laterally centered. Under 1910.178(o)(1) and (o)(2), only stable or safely arranged loads within the truck's rated capacity may be handled, with caution for off-center loads that cannot be centered.

Rolls stored in tiers fall under 1910.176(b), which requires that storage of material not create a hazard and that bags, containers, bundles, and similar items stored in tiers be stacked, blocked, interlocked, and limited in height so that they are stable and secure against sliding or collapse (ASME B20.1-2024; MHI ANSI MH29.2-2020; MHI ANSI MH29.3-2023; ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2020; OSHA 29 CFR 1910 Subpart N-2019, §1910.176 and §1910.178).

What makes felt and fabric changes a handling problem?​

Press felts and other paper machine clothing are replaced periodically, and the work is done on the machine, among its rolls and nips. Felt handling therefore has two sides: getting a heavy roll of fabric into the machine without damaging it, and keeping people away from nips while they work close to it.

AstenJohnson's Paper Machine Clothing sets out the installation practice for press fabrics:

  • Seamed fabrics are staged in a dry location, and the fabric is kept as dry as possible during installation.
  • At start-up, fabric tension is raised to the normal running level, typically 15 to 25 pli (2.6 to 4.4 kN/m).
  • About 75% of North American press fabrics are seamed, adopted mainly for safety and for reduced installation time.
  • For a shutdown of more than two hours with the fabric left on the machine, the press roll is unloaded or lifted clear of the fabric once the press section is stationary, to avoid localized felt compaction.

Those practices translate directly into handling requirements: a dry, covered staging area near the machine, a lifting method for the fabric roll that does not crush or wet it, and a tensioning system whose setting can be confirmed rather than guessed.

The nip hazard during felt work is documented. In NIOSH FACE Report 95-13, after a paper break, a shift supervisor entered an unguarded access area without raising the top roll. He was feeling the woolen felt when his hands were drawn into the operating roll nip. His arm was partially amputated at the shoulder, and he died of extensive blood loss. NIOSH recommended guarding access to hazardous areas and installing permanent interlocking gates. The same principle appears elsewhere on the machine: paragraph 1910.261(k)(18) requires the nip hazard on all calender rolls to be eliminated or minimized by an effective barrier device, or by feeding the paper by rope carrier, air jets, or hand feeding devices (AstenJohnson 2017, Ch. 3, Sect. 3.2.2, 3.4.1 and 3.4.2; NIOSH FACE Report 95-13, 1995; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraph k.18).

How do sensors, interlocks, and drives control roll and reel handling equipment?​

Most of the 1910.261 handling paragraphs are controls requirements stated in mechanical language, and each one maps to a sensor, a safety function, and a drive behavior:

  • Braking emergency stops. Paragraph (k)(1) requires paper machines to have devices that stop the machine quickly in an emergency: push buttons, pull cords, control clutches, or other devices, interlocked with adequate braking action, located so anyone working on the machine can quickly disconnect it, and tested periodically by using them to stop the machine. In the finishing room, (l)(2) requires quick power disconnecting devices interlocked with braking action on all operating sides, within easy reach, and tested the same way. The braking has to be designed and sized for the inertia of a full roll, which is a drive and tuning question, not only a wiring one.
  • Drive-interlocked barriers. Paragraph (k)(26) interlocks winder and rewinder barriers with the drive mechanism. On a modern drive, the interlock removes torque through a safety function rather than relying on a run command alone. Allen-Bradley Kinetix 5700 servo drives have safe torque-off built into the drive.
  • Jog speed and zero speed. Paragraph (l)(9)(i) allows operation only at jog speed with the rewinder guard open and calls for a zero-speed switch so the guard cannot be raised while the roll turns. As a design choice, not a requirement of the standard, the same zero-speed signal can serve as the permissive for (k)(24)(i), which requires reels to stop rotating before being lifted from their bearings.
  • Safety logic. Guard, zero-speed, and emergency-stop functions belong in a separate safety task in a safety controller. Rockwell Automation rates a GuardLogix 5580 primary controller with a safety partner for safety applications up to SIL 3 and PL e (Cat. 4). Standard sequencing, such as roll transfer, kicker, and upender logic, runs in Logix 5000 continuous, periodic, and event tasks.
  • Position and load sensing. Encoders on conveyor and car drives let the PLC slow a roll before it reaches a stop. A load cell on a reel crane or lifter compares the lifted weight with the rated load that 1910.179(b)(5) requires to be marked.
  • Tuning. Rockwell Automation notes that autotuned servo loop bandwidths depend on the application and can require adjustment once the motor and load are connected. An upender or roll kicker tuned empty has to be rechecked with a full roll on it.

The machine's electrical equipment as a whole falls under IEC 60204-1:2016, which applies to the electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic equipment of machines. UTEC Industrial, a Rockwell Automation Recognized System Integrator, builds UL 508A panels and programs Allen-Bradley ControlLogix and CompactLogix control with VFD and servo drives for the handling systems it builds (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraphs k.1, k.24, k.26, l.2 and l.9; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, Kinetix 5700; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM012J-EN-P-2025; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025; IEC 60204-1:2016).

How is energy isolated before work on roll handling equipment?​

The roll wrapper fatality turned on a machine that could still cycle while a person was inside it. Paper mill equipment holds energy in several forms at once: electrical drives, pneumatic arms and clamps, raised reels and lifters, and rolls that can simply roll. The isolation rules are layered:

  • Main disconnect lockout. Paragraph 1910.261(b)(1) requires padlocks or similar devices for locking out the source of power at the main disconnect switch. Before any maintenance, inspection, cleaning, adjusting, or servicing that requires entrance into or close contact with the machinery, the main power disconnect switch or valve, or both, controlling its source of power or flow of material, shall be locked out or blocked off with a padlock, blank flange, or similar device.
  • Drive lockout. Paragraph 1910.261(k)(2)(i) requires all drives to have lockout devices at the power switch that interrupts the flow of current to the unit.
  • Control devices are not isolation. OSHA's lockout standard, 29 CFR 1910.147, defines push buttons, selector switches, and other control-circuit-type devices as not being energy-isolating devices. An e-stop or a PLC stop is not a lockout point.
  • Stored energy. Under 1910.147(d)(5)(i), all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy shall be relieved, disconnected, restrained, and otherwise rendered safe after lockout devices are applied. A bumper arm held up by air, a roll resting in a cradle, and a reel hanging on a crane are exactly that kind of energy.

The design implication is that each handling machine needs a lockable disconnect for every energy source, bleed-down for pneumatic and hydraulic circuits, mechanical blocking points for raised arms and lifters, and roll chocks or stops for any roll inside a guarded zone (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraphs b.1 and k.2; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147-1989; Minnesota FACE Report 03MN039, 2004).

Where does roll handling equipment sit in the design and build chain?​

A reel lifter, core shaft manipulator, roll upender, or conveyor transfer is designed and built along one chain, and the mill's requirements enter at every link:

  • Design and engineering. The maximum reel or roll weight, the diameter and width range, and the cycle rate set the structure. For devices on a crane hook, ASME BTH-1-2023 is the design standard.
  • Parts machining. Journals, shafts, pins, and bearing seats are machined parts whose fit and finish decide fatigue life. For reel-spool journals, TAPPI TIP 0402-34 (2023) covers crack testing, design concepts, and failures.
  • Fabrication, weld fatigue, and stress relief. An upender or roll cradle cycled dozens of times a day loads its welded frame repeatedly, so weld details are assessed for fatigue and the frame is stress-relieved before it is machined.
  • Drives, controls, and tuning. The braking stops, drive-interlocked barriers, and zero-speed functions of 1910.261 are implemented here and tuned to the loaded inertia.
  • Monitoring. Journal crack testing, lifting-equipment inspection under (k)(24)(ii), and periodic testing of emergency stops under (k)(1) and (l)(2) keep the design limits in force.

A requirement left out at the design end, such as a zero-speed permissive on a reel lift, cannot be added cleanly at commissioning because the sensor, the wiring, and the safety logic all have to exist. UTEC Industrial stress-relieves and machines the welded frames of the handling equipment it builds before assembly (ASME BTH-1-2023; TAPPI TIP 0402-34, 2023; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016, paragraphs k.1, k.24 and l.2).

What should a mill specify before buying roll, reel, or felt handling equipment?​

A request for quotation that states only a roll weight and a travel distance leaves out most of what 1910.261 and the mill's own process require. A complete specification defines:

  • Load envelope: maximum and minimum reel, roll, and core shaft weights, diameters, widths, and core sizes, and whether rolls are handled horizontally, on end, or both.
  • Cycle rate: lifts, transfers, or insertions per hour and per day, since a task repeated 24 times per day, as in the OSHA core shaft case, loads the structure and drives very differently from an occasional lift.
  • Governing paragraphs: the 1910.261 paragraphs that apply, typically (b)(1), (k)(1), (k)(24), (k)(26), (k)(29), (k)(30), (l)(2), and (l)(9), plus ASME B20.1-2024, MHI ANSI MH29.2-2020, MHI ANSI MH29.3-2023, ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2020, ASME B30.2-2022, ASME BTH-1-2023, and ASME B30.20-2025 as the equipment type requires.
  • Controls and sensing: braking e-stops on every operating side, drive-interlocked barriers, zero-speed and jog-speed functions, load and position sensing, and the PLC and safety controller platform.
  • Isolation: lockable disconnects for each energy source, bleed-down, and blocking points.
  • Felt and fabric access: dry staging space and a lifting method for fabric rolls.
  • Acceptance: the functional tests of each interlock and stop, the rated-load marking, and the factory and site tests required before handover.

UTEC Industrial performs factory acceptance testing and on-site commissioning, so each interlock and braking stop can be demonstrated against the specification before the equipment enters the mill (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016; OSHA Ergonomics Success Story, Paper Roll Loading, 2007; ASME B20.1-2024; ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2020; ASME BTH-1-2023).

Related Articles

References​

  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.261-2016: Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills. U.S. Department of Labor, 2016.
  • OSHA. Paper Roll Loading, Including Insertion of Core Shaft/Spindle and Positioning of Roll. Ergonomics Success Story, OSHA–AF&PA/PPSA Alliance, U.S. Department of Labor, 2007.
  • OSHA. Employee Is Killed When Caught by Conveyor Belt and Roll, Accident Summary No. 201331204. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
  • Minnesota Department of Health. Paper Mill Maintenance Employee Dies After Being Pinned by the Arm of a Control Mechanism in a Roll Wrap Machine. MN FACE Report 03MN039, 2004.
  • NIOSH. Shift Supervisor Dies from Injuries Received After His Arms Were Caught Between Two Paper Machine Rollers—Tennessee. FACE Report 95-13, 1995.
  • AstenJohnson. Paper Machine Clothing, 2nd ed. AstenJohnson, 2017.
  • TAPPI TIP 0402-34: Paper Machine Reel-Spool Journals: Guidelines for Crack Testing and Repair or Replacement. TAPPI Press, 2023.
  • Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A (1994). Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-110 (revised 2021), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910 Subpart N-2019: Materials Handling and Storage. U.S. Department of Labor, 2019.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016: Overhead and Gantry Cranes. U.S. Department of Labor, 2016.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147-1989: The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 1989.
  • ASME B30.2-2022: Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Single or Multiple Girder, Top Running Trolley Hoist). ASME, 2022.
  • CMAA Specification No. 70-2025: Specifications for Top Running Bridge and Gantry Type Multiple Girder Electric Overhead Traveling Cranes. CMAA, 2025.
  • ASME BTH-1-2023: Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices. ASME, 2023.
  • ASME B30.20-2025: Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices. ASME, 2025.
  • ASME B20.1-2024: Safety Standard for Conveyors and Related Equipment. ASME, 2024.
  • MHI ANSI MH29.2-2020: Safety Requirements for Industrial Tilters. MHI, 2020.
  • MHI ANSI MH29.3-2023: Safety Requirements for Industrial Turntables. MHI, 2023.
  • ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2020: Safety Standard for Low Lift and High Lift Trucks. Industrial Truck Standards Development Foundation, 2020.
  • Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018): Kinetix 5700 Servo Drives User Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2018.
  • Rockwell Automation 1756-RM012J-EN-P-2025: GuardLogix 5580 and Compact GuardLogix 5380 Controllers Safety Reference Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
  • Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025: Logix 5000 Controllers Design Considerations. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
  • IEC 60204-1:2016 (Ed. 6.0): Safety of Machinery -- Electrical Equipment of Machines -- Part 1: General Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2016.

Ready to Discuss a Material Handling System?​

UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for heavy industry, from the stress-relieved structure and drives to the Allen-Bradley PLC controls, tuning, and monitoring that run them, at its Spokane Valley, WA facility. Send UTEC the application, loads, and duty cycle to start a system review.

Request a Quote →

Questions? Call (509) 922-1832 or email sales@utec.co

Last updated on