Skip to main content

Material Handling in Mining and Mineral Processing (MSHA 30 CFR)

A mine or mineral processing plant moves broken rock, ore, and concentrate continuously through feeders, crushers, screens, mills, and conveyors, and it replaces heavy wear parts inside that same equipment on a recurring schedule. UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for aerospace and heavy industry from its Spokane Valley, WA facility, integrating Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control with in-house CNC machining, heat treating, and stress relief. This article works from the mine operator's side: which parts of MSHA's 30 CFR apply, what the rules require of conveyors, drives, lifted loads, hoists, and haul roads, which hazards dominate a crushing and grinding plant, and what sensing and control the handling equipment needs. Mine handling equipment is designed and built along one chain, design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring, and a guarding or lockout requirement missed at the design link has to be retrofitted in the field later.

Which MSHA rules govern material handling at a mine or mineral processing plant?​

Mine safety and health standards are issued by the Mine Safety and Health Administration in Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and the part that applies depends on what is mined and where the work happens:

  • 30 CFR Part 56 sets mandatory safety and health standards for each surface metal or nonmetal mine, including open pit mines, subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. A copper or gold concentrator beside an open pit, a hard-rock crushing plant, and an industrial-mineral mill all sit here.
  • 30 CFR Part 57 covers each underground metal or nonmetal mine, including related surface operations. The crushing plant or hoist house at the collar of an underground mine is therefore read against Part 57, not Part 56.
  • 30 CFR Part 77 covers bituminous, anthracite, and lignite surface coal mines, including open pit and auger mines, and the surface work areas of underground coal mines, such as a coal preparation plant's conveyors and loadout.

Part 56 and Part 57 state the same purpose for their standards: the protection of life, the promotion of health and safety, and the prevention of accidents. The practical effect for anyone specifying handling equipment is that the purchase specification should name the governing part before any drawing is started, because guarding, lockout, and haulage requirements are written into each part separately and the finished equipment has to satisfy them where it is installed (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.1; MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.1; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.1).

What handling hazards dominate a crushing and grinding plant?​

A concentrator's handling chain starts with feeders and belt conveyors delivering ore to the crushers, continues through grates, drums, and vibrating screens, and ends in ball or rod mills operating in one or several grinding stages. A 2025 review of 38 studies published between 2000 and 2023 identified the key occupational hazards in ore crushing and grinding as dust, noise, vibration, and mechanical injuries, and put numbers on each:

  • Dust. Crystalline silicon dioxide at crusher workplaces ranged from 10% to 70% of the dust, and dust concentrations during crushing and screening exceeded maximum permissible concentrations by more than 3 to 5 times. Plants running outdated jaw and cone crushers reached 36 to 48 mg/m³.
  • Noise. Industrial noise across the plant ran 80 to 105 dB. Screen operators were exposed to 100 to 105 dB during the shift and up to 112 dB in the immediate vicinity during inspection and maintenance, against the 85 dB(A) threshold the review cites for systematic 8-hour exposure.
  • Vibration. Workers were exposed to vibration for up to 43% to 56% of working time.
  • Mechanical injury. Injuries to the musculoskeletal system, brain concussions, and contusions dominated the injury structure, and the review attributes mechanical-equipment injuries most often to lack of equipment protection or improper use of tools. Conveyor operators travel galleries whose height reaches 35 to 40 m.

The review also reports that accidents occurred in greater numbers on evening and night shifts and in the second half of a shift. For a specifying engineer, these figures define the environment the handling equipment works in: guards must hold up to continuous vibration, access routes must be walked by tired people at night, and the noisiest and dustiest moments are the maintenance tasks, not normal running (Nuruldaeva et al. 2025, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering vol. 15 no. 3, pp. 415-426).

What does MSHA require for guarding conveyors, drives, and pulleys?​

Guarding applies to nearly every drive, pulley, and shaft in a mine's handling system, and the text is specific about which parts must be covered. Under Part 56, moving machine parts must be guarded to protect persons from contacting gears, sprockets, chains, drive, head, tail, and takeup pulleys, flywheels, couplings, shafts, fan blades, and similar moving parts that can cause injury. Part 57 carries the same list for underground mines. The one geometric exemption is height: guards are not required where the exposed moving parts are at least seven feet away from walking or working surfaces.

The guards themselves carry performance requirements. Section 56.14112 requires guards to be constructed and maintained to withstand the vibration, shock, and wear to which they will be subjected during normal operation, and not to create a hazard by their use. They must be securely in place while machinery is operated, except when testing or making adjustments that cannot be performed without removing the guard.

Part 77 adds two details that matter at a coal preparation plant. Guards at conveyor-drive, conveyor-head, and conveyor-tail pulleys must extend a distance sufficient to prevent a person from reaching behind the guard and becoming caught between the belt and the pulley, and overhead belts must be guarded if the whipping action from a broken line would be hazardous to persons below.

A common failure mode follows directly from these rules: a light expanded-metal panel that is adequate on a packaging line cracks at its mounting tabs under crusher-house vibration, gets removed for a cleanup, and is never refitted. Guard design for a mine is therefore a structural and maintenance problem, with panel stiffness, fastener retention, and removal weight chosen for the site (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14107 and §56.14112; MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.14107; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.400).

How must conveyors beside travelways be protected and started?​

Belt conveyors run for long distances beside walkways, and MSHA treats the walkway edge as a hazard of its own. An unguarded conveyor next to a travelway must be equipped with either emergency stop devices located so that a person falling on or against the conveyor can readily deactivate the conveyor drive motor, or railings positioned to prevent persons from falling on or against the conveyor. The railings must withstand the vibration, shock, and wear of normal operation and must not create a hazard.

Start-up is regulated separately:

  • When the entire length of a conveyor is visible from the starting switch, the operator must visually check that all persons are in the clear before starting.
  • When the entire length is not visible, a system that provides a visible or audible warning must be installed and operated, and within 30 seconds after the warning the conveyor must be started or a second warning given.

Section 56.14110 adds a requirement for the areas around the handling equipment: where flying or falling materials generated by screens, crushers, or conveyors present a hazard, guards, shields, or other devices must be provided to protect persons. MSHA's conveyor safety guidance recommends pull cords for emergency stops at strategic locations, advises never crossing a moving belt except at suitable crossings, and recommends practical belt crossing facilities at strategic locations, including near controls, when height allows. Together these rules turn a long overland or plant conveyor into a controls problem, because each pull cord, warning horn, and beacon becomes an input or output the start sequence has to honor (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14109, §56.14110 and §56.14201; MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.14109 and §57.14201; MSHA, Safety Topic: Conveyor Systems, 2026).

Why do so many conveyor injuries happen during maintenance?​

MSHA states that fatal accidents related to working near, inspecting, adjusting, or maintaining conveyor belts occur each year at both underground and surface mines. A cause-consequence back-analysis of conveyor-belt injuries in crushing and milling plants, built on accident reports and an injury that occurred at an Italian quarry, reached the same conclusion from the design side: moving parts are a critical cause of accidents and injuries, several of them tied to entering working zones during maintenance, so maintenance operations have to be carefully planned during the design phase, alongside preventive measures for maintenance and daily work.

The regulations set the minimum conditions for that work:

  • Repairs or maintenance must be performed only after the power is off and the machinery is blocked against hazardous motion. Motion is permitted only to the extent that adjustments or testing cannot be performed without it, and then only if persons are effectively protected from hazardous motion.
  • Conveyor pulleys must not be cleaned manually while the conveyor is in motion.
  • At surface coal operations, machinery must not be lubricated while in motion where a hazard exists unless it is equipped with extended fittings or cups.

Each of these has a design answer. Grease lines run out to a point outside the guard satisfy the lubrication rule without removing a guard. Belt cleaners and skirting that can be adjusted from outside the guarded envelope reduce the number of times a crew has to reach toward a pulley. A takeup that can be mechanically pinned before work removes stored belt tension from the pulley a mechanic is about to touch. These are choices made at the design and fabrication links of the chain, and they are very difficult to add once the conveyor is installed (MSHA, Safety Topic: Conveyor Systems, 2026; Martinetti et al. 2017, American Journal of Applied Sciences vol. 14 no. 1, pp. 1-12; MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14105 and §56.14202; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.404).

What does lockout look like at a mine, and how does it shape the electrical design?​

MSHA's lockout language is short and places the burden on the equipment's power switches. Electrically powered equipment must be deenergized before mechanical work is done on it; power switches must be locked out, or other measures taken, so the equipment cannot be energized without the knowledge of the individuals working on it; suitable warning notices must be posted at the power switch and signed by the individuals doing the work; and the locks may be removed only by the persons who installed them or by authorized personnel. Part 57 uses the same text underground. Work on power circuits follows a parallel rule: the circuits are deenergized unless hot-line tools are used, and switches are locked out.

MSHA's conveyor guidance adds a practice point: it is best if the person doing the work personally disconnects and locks the power and restores it afterward. That favors a lockable disconnect at or near each drive, where the mechanic can see both the switch and the machine, over a single lockout point in a distant motor control center.

The electrical design has to respect the difference between stopping and isolating. OSHA's general-industry lockout standard, which does not govern mines (MSHA's Title 30 rules above do), defines push buttons, selector switches, and other control-circuit-type devices as not being energy-isolating devices, and that definition is borrowed here only as a design test for a mine conveyor: a PLC stop or a pull cord removes the run command, but it does not isolate the motor. The machine's electrical equipment as a whole is addressed by IEC 60204-1:2016, whose scope covers the electrical and programmable electronic equipment of machines not portable by hand while working, starting at the point where the supply connects to the machine. UTEC Industrial builds UL 508A control panels for the handling systems it supplies (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.12016 and §56.12017; MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.12016; MSHA, Safety Topic: Conveyor Systems, 2026; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147-1989; IEC 60204-1:2016).

How do suspended loads, raised components, and wear-part changes fit MSHA rules?​

Much of a concentrator's heavy handling is not conveying at all. It is maintenance lifting: crusher mantles and concaves, mill liners, screen decks, and pulleys lifted out of equipment that was not designed around easy access. The general rules that govern those lifts are brief:

  • Persons must stay clear of suspended loads.
  • Taglines must be attached to loads that may require steadying or guidance while suspended, and hitches and slings used to hoist materials must be suitable for the particular material handled.
  • Safety belts and lines must be worn where there is danger of falling, and a second person must tend the lifeline when bins, tanks, or other dangerous areas are entered.

The raised-component rule, written for mobile equipment, sets a useful benchmark for any handling device that holds a load overhead. Persons may not work on top of, under, or from a raised component until it has been blocked or mechanically secured to prevent accidental lowering, and a raised component is considered secured if it has a functional load-locking device or a device that prevents free and uncontrolled descent.

These rules push liner and wear-part handling toward engineered devices. A purpose-built liner handler, lifting fixture, or positioning cart holds the part on a defined load path, lets the crew steer it without standing under it, and carries a mechanical lock rather than relying on a hydraulic cylinder alone. The failure mode to design out is the one the rules describe: a person under or beside a load whose only restraint is a line, a valve, or a hand on a tagline (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14211, §56.15005, §56.16007 and §56.16009).

What changes underground for hoisting and haulage?​

Underground metal and nonmetal mines move ore, rock, people, and supplies through shafts, and Part 57 contains a hoisting subpart. Its hoisting standards apply to hoists and appurtenances used for hoisting persons; where persons may be endangered by hoists used solely for handling ore, rock, and materials, the appropriate standards should be applied. The wire-rope standards, 57.19021 through 57.19028, apply to ropes that hoist persons in shafts and slopes underground, persons on a surface incline hoist, and loads in shaft or slope development when persons work below suspended loads.

Minimum rope strength at installation is set by formula, where L is the maximum suspended rope length in feet:

  • Winding drum ropes, L under 3,000 ft: minimum value = static load × (7.0 − 0.001L); at 3,000 ft or greater, static load × 4.0.
  • Friction drum ropes, L under 4,000 ft: static load × (7.0 − 0.0005L); at 4,000 ft or greater, static load × 5.0.
  • Tail ropes: weight of rope × 7.0.

A short worked check shows how the requirement falls with depth. For a winding drum rope with L = 2,000 ft, the multiplier is 7.0 − 0.001 × 2,000 = 5.0, so the rope's nominal catalog strength must be at least 5.0 times the static load. At L = 1,000 ft the multiplier is 6.0; at 3,000 ft and beyond it holds at 4.0. The stated assumptions are a winding drum installation, a rope in one of the services listed in 57.19000, and a static load and suspended length taken from the actual installation; the rule sets the multiplier and the rope catalog supplies only the nominal strength it is compared against.

Part 57 repeats the moving-machine-parts guarding rule and the conveyor start-up warning rule in substantively the same words, including the seven-foot exemption and the 30-second start-up warning (MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.14107, §57.14201, §57.19000 and §57.19021).

How do haul roads, dump points, and rail haulage constrain handling equipment?​

Where the plant's handling system meets mobile equipment, the rules move to berms, stops, and clearances. At surface metal and nonmetal mines, berms or guardrails must be provided on roadway banks where a drop-off could overturn a vehicle, and they must be at least mid-axle height of the largest self-propelled mobile equipment that usually travels the roadway. That rule is not applicable to rail beds.

Part 77 sets requirements that apply directly to dump hoppers, truck dumps, and rail loadout at coal operations:

  • Berms, bumper blocks, safety hooks, or similar means must be provided to prevent overtravel and overturning at dumping locations.
  • Grizzlies, grates, and other sizing devices at dump and transfer points must be anchored securely in place.
  • Where practicable, a minimum of 30 in of continuous clearance from the farthest projection of moving railroad equipment must be provided on at least one side of the tracks, and places without it must be marked conspicuously.
  • Positive-acting stop-blocks, derail devices, track skates, or other adequate means must be installed wherever necessary to protect persons from runaway or moving railroad equipment, and bumper blocks or the equivalent provided at track dead ends where necessary.
  • Rocker-bottom or bottom-dump cars must have positive locking devices or other suitable devices.

For a rail-guided car, a dump hopper, or a loadout, these rules define the end stops, the anchorage of the grizzly frame, and the clearance envelope before the structural design begins (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.9300; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.1605 and §77.1608).

What sensing, PLC control, and interlocks does mine handling equipment need?​

The MSHA rules above read like mechanical requirements, but most of them are enforced through the control system. A concentrator conveyor line, a crusher feed, or a liner handler needs its intelligence layer to know that the path is clear, that the stop devices are healthy, and that the machine is in a state where people can approach it:

  • Emergency stops and pull cords. For an unguarded conveyor next to a travelway, Section 56.14109 requires either emergency stop devices located so that a person falling on or against the conveyor can readily deactivate the drive motor, or railings. As a common design approach rather than a regulatory requirement, pull-cord switches along the belt are wired into a safety circuit that removes drive torque and latches the stop until it is reset at the switch that tripped.
  • Start-up sequencing. Where the whole conveyor is not visible from the starting switch, the 30-second warning rule in 56.14201 becomes a PLC sequence: give the audible or visible warning, run a timer, and start within 30 seconds or repeat the warning. Separately, as general design practice rather than an MSHA requirement, upstream conveyors are started only after downstream conveyors are proven running, so a stopped belt is not buried.
  • Belt and machine condition sensing. Speed sensors on tail pulleys detect slip or a broken belt, misalignment switches detect belt drift before the edge is destroyed, and chute-plug and level sensors protect transfer points. Load cells or belt scales measure feed rate to a crusher or mill.
  • Drives. A variable-frequency drive gives a loaded conveyor a controlled start instead of an across-the-line jolt. For a positioning axis on a liner handler, a servo drive such as the Allen-Bradley Kinetix 5700 closes position, velocity, and current loops on encoder feedback and has safe torque-off built into the drive.
  • PLC and safety logic. Logix 5000 controllers organize code into continuous, periodic, and event tasks, so conveyor interlocks can run at a fixed period. Safety functions run in a separate safety task in a controller such as a GuardLogix 5580, which Rockwell Automation rates for safety applications up to SIL 3 and PL e (Cat. 4) with a safety partner, and up to SIL 2 and PL d (Cat. 3) without one.
  • Standards. ISO 12100:2010 covers the risk assessment and risk reduction that identify the hazards, and ISO 13849-1:2023 covers the design of the safety-related parts of the control system that address them.

UTEC Industrial, a Rockwell Automation Recognized System Integrator, integrates Allen-Bradley ControlLogix and CompactLogix control, PanelView HMIs, and VFD and servo drives into the handling equipment it builds (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14109 and §56.14201; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, Kinetix 5700; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM012J-EN-P-2025; ISO 12100:2010; ISO 13849-1:2023).

How should transfer points, screens, and mills be designed for dust and noise?​

Dust and noise are generated where material changes direction or is struck: loading points, reloading points, screens, and crushers. The 2025 review describes the controls used at crushing units:

  • Enclosure and aspiration. Dust sources are separated from the surrounding space by enclosures whose design depends on the dust source, and dusty air is aspirated from those enclosures and cleaned in dust collectors; the review identifies dust extraction as the most universal method, with hydraulic spraying and general ventilation alongside it.
  • Where dust spikes. Concentrations near emission sources averaged 1.5 to 4 times the maximum permissible concentration and rose sharply during spill cleanup, visual inspection of bunker filling at inspection grilles, and dry cleaning. Conveyor operators spent up to 30% to 35% of working time in isolated control cabins where the air was low in dust.
  • Noise control. Vibrating screens were enclosed with 2 to 3 mm sheet steel fences, and coating their inner surfaces with sound-absorbing material gave 20 to 26 dB of sound insulation. Soundproof fences on the mill drum, rubber linings, and vibration-isolating linings reduced impact noise from grinding media.

At coal operations Part 77 adds an operating requirement: dust control measures must be taken where dust significantly reduces the visibility of equipment operators. NIOSH's Information Circular 9532 compiles dust-control technology for coal mining, including a chapter on surface mining controls and one on float coal dust sampling and control. The handling-equipment consequence is that skirt boards, chute enclosures, inspection doors, and remote monitoring are designed together: every inspection that can be done by camera or sensor from a cabin is one fewer trip into the dustiest point in the plant (Nuruldaeva et al. 2025, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering vol. 15 no. 3, pp. 415-426; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.1607; NIOSH, Information Circular 9532, 2021).

How are mine handling systems examined, maintained, and monitored once running?​

MSHA builds inspection into every shift. At surface metal and nonmetal mines, a competent person designated by the operator must examine each working place at least once each shift, before miners begin work there, for conditions that may adversely affect safety or health. A record must be made before the end of that shift, naming the examiner, the date, the areas examined, and each condition found, and the operator must keep the records for at least one year.

Defect handling is also prescribed. Defects on any equipment, machinery, and tools that affect safety must be corrected in a timely manner, and when defects make continued operation hazardous, the defective items must be taken out of service and placed in a designated area, or tagged or otherwise marked to prohibit further use until corrected. At surface coal operations, machinery in unsafe condition must be removed from service immediately.

The tuning and monitoring links of the chain give those examinations measured evidence:

  • Tuning. The Kinetix 5700 commissioning procedure includes a tuning step for each axis, and autotuned loop bandwidths depend on the application and can require adjustment once the motor and load are connected. A liner-handler axis tuned empty behaves differently with a liner on it, so tuning is checked at load during commissioning.
  • Condition monitoring. Trending drive current, pull-cord trips, belt-slip events, bearing temperature, and gearbox vibration on the PLC or a historian shows wear before a pulley bearing seizes or a belt tears.
  • Stop-device testing. Pull cords, misalignment switches, and start-up warnings are safety devices; logging each test gives the shift examination a record the operator can show an inspector.

A common failure mode is the stop device that is never exercised: a pull-cord switch seized by fines that no longer trips when pulled. Periodic testing, logged by the control system, catches it before it is needed (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14100 and §56.18002; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.404; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, Kinetix 5700).

What should a mine operator define before requesting handling equipment?​

A request that states only capacity and conveyor length leaves out most of what drives a mine handling system's design. A complete specification from the operator defines:

  • Governing rule set: Part 56, Part 57, or Part 77, and any site standards layered on top, so guarding, lockout, and haulage details are designed to the right text.
  • Material and duty: ore type, lump size, abrasiveness, moisture, feed rate, and operating hours per year, since these set wear-liner selection and bearing life.
  • Maintenance tasks: which wear parts are changed, how often, and by what route, so lifting points, access platforms, and mechanical locks are designed in rather than added later.
  • Environment: dust, water, temperature range, and noise limits at operator stations.
  • Controls and sensing: PLC platform and network, stop-device layout, start-up warning scheme, condition sensors, and integration with the plant control system.
  • Acceptance: the factory tests and site tests required before handover, including functional tests of every stop device and interlock.

Along the build chain, the welded frames of feeders, liner handlers, and transfer cars see continuous vibration at a mine, so weld fatigue and stress relief matter as much as static strength. UTEC Industrial stress-relieves and machines welded frames in-house, and performs factory acceptance testing and on-site commissioning so that the specified interlocks are demonstrated before equipment ships (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.1; MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.1; MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026, §77.1).

Related Articles

References​

  • MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026: Safety and Health Standards—Surface Metal and Nonmetal Mines. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026.
  • MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026: Safety and Health Standards—Underground Metal and Nonmetal Mines. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026.
  • MSHA 30 CFR Part 77-2026: Mandatory Safety Standards, Surface Coal Mines and Surface Work Areas of Underground Coal Mines. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026.
  • MSHA. Safety Topic: Conveyor Systems. Mine Safety and Health Administration, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
  • Nuruldaeva, G., Isakhanova, A., Kumar, D., Kumar, B. (2025). "Occupational Hazards in Mineral Ore Crushing and Grinding: A Literature Review." International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 15(3), 415-426. DOI 10.18280/ijsse.150302.
  • Martinetti, A., van Dongen, L.A.M., Romano, R. (2017). "Beyond Accidents: A Back-Analysis on Conveyor Belt Injury for a Better Design for Maintenance Operations." American Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(1), 1-12. DOI 10.3844/ajassp.2017.1.12.
  • NIOSH. Information Circular 9532: Best Practices for Dust Control in Coal Mining, 2nd ed. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2021-119, 2021.
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147-1989: The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 1989.
  • IEC 60204-1:2016 (Ed. 6.0): Safety of Machinery -- Electrical Equipment of Machines -- Part 1: General Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2016.
  • ISO 12100:2010: Safety of machinery — General principles for design — Risk assessment and risk reduction. ISO, 2010.
  • ISO 13849-1:2023: Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems — Part 1: General principles for design. International Organization for Standardization, 2023.
  • Rockwell Automation 1756-RM012J-EN-P-2025: GuardLogix 5580 and Compact GuardLogix 5380 Controllers Safety Reference Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
  • Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025: Logix 5000 Controllers Design Considerations. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
  • Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018): Kinetix 5700 Servo Drives User Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2018.

Ready to Discuss a Material Handling System?​

UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for heavy industry, from the stress-relieved structure and drives to the Allen-Bradley PLC controls, tuning, and monitoring that run them, at its Spokane Valley, WA facility. Send UTEC the application, loads, and duty cycle to start a system review.

Request a Quote →

Questions? Call (509) 922-1832 or email sales@utec.co

Last updated on