Skip to main content

Bulk Material Handling in Abrasive Mineral Processing Service

A mineral processing plant moves broken ore, sand, and concentrate through feeders, conveyors, chutes, screws, and bins, and in quartz-bearing or hard-rock service the steel surfaces the material slides across wear away. UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for aerospace and heavy industry from its Spokane Valley, WA facility, integrating Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control with in-house CNC machining, heat treating, and stress relief. This article works from the plant operator's side: how abrasive bulk materials are classified, where wear concentrates, what surface treatment has been measured to buy, why cleaning and blockage clearing are prominent in the maintenance-fatality record, which MSHA rules govern bins, restarts, and maintenance, and what sensing and control an abrasive-service line needs. Abrasive-service equipment is designed and built along one chain, design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring, and a wear allowance or access door missed at the design link becomes a shutdown later.

What makes mineral processing bulk handling abrasive service?​

In a concentrator, feeders and belt conveyors deliver ore to the crushers, the ore is screened, and it is ground in ball or rod mills in one or several stages; the same broken rock touches steel at each step. In abrasive service, the wear of concern comes from the material itself rather than from load or fatigue. A 2021 test-stand study of pad-welded belt-conveyor elements notes that conveyors transporting spoil in a quartz sand mine are exposed to accelerated wear from the effect of quartz on their metal elements and that intensive wear of metal parts leads to downtime and the need to replace damaged parts. In the study's test-stand samples, run in metal–quartz sand–rubber conditions, the main wear mechanism was abrasion from the interaction between the steel surface and hard sand particles.

As engineering reasoning, that mechanism sets the design problem. The handling equipment is not failing because it is overloaded; it is losing section thickness at a rate set by what the ore contains, how fast it moves, and how it strikes or slides across each surface. The first design step is therefore to describe the material in a standard way. CEMA's standard for that is ANSI/CEMA 550-2020, which sets out a systematic method for classifying and describing bulk materials by their physical characteristics and handling properties, and defines the terminology, test procedures, and classification criteria that are fundamental to the proper selection and design of bulk material handling equipment (Romek et al. 2021, Materials vol. 14 no. 15, 4323; Nuruldaeva et al. 2025, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering vol. 15 no. 3, pp. 415-426; ANSI/CEMA 550-2020).

How is a bulk material's abrasiveness classified before equipment is selected?​

Conveyor selection starts from a material description, not from a conveyor catalog. CEMA's bulk-material practice describes a material by a set of characteristics that includes bulk density, particle size, flowability, and abrasiveness, with further characteristics such as dustiness, stickiness, or aeration noted where they apply. Two CEMA documents are relevant here:

  • ANSI/CEMA 550-2020 sets the classification and the definitions of those physical characteristics, including abrasiveness, and the test procedures used to determine them.
  • ANSI/CEMA 350-2021 gives engineering guidance for the design and application of screw conveyors, and its publisher page lists conveyor selection, capacity considerations, and material characteristics among its topics. In the screw conveyor material code, the abrasiveness position runs from mildly abrasive through moderately abrasive to extremely abrasive, and the material's class sets the component series and the maximum trough loading. The most abrasive materials are assigned the lowest trough loading, 15%, and the heaviest component series, against 45% loading for light, free-flowing, nonabrasive materials.

As engineering reasoning, the same nominal capacity then requires a physically larger, slower, and heavier screw conveyor when the ore is abrasive, because only a fraction of the trough can be filled and the flights, hangers, and trough must carry more wear allowance. A plant that specifies an abrasive-service screw from a nonabrasive capacity table can end up with a conveyor running too full and too fast, and its flights wear through first. The same material description should also go to the designer of a belt, drag-chain, or bucket-elevator system, since abrasiveness bears on liner, chain, and bucket selection in each (ANSI/CEMA 550-2020, classification and abrasiveness definitions; ANSI/CEMA 350-2021, material classification code and trough-loading tables).

Where does abrasive wear concentrate in a mineral processing handling line?​

As engineering reasoning, wear concentrates where the material changes speed or direction against steel. A 2025 review of crushing and grinding hazards identified the main dust sources during the operation of crushing units as the loading site, the reloading sites, the screens, and the crushers, and reported dust concentrations near emission sources averaging 1.5 to 4 times the maximum permissible concentration. The review does not measure wear, but a transfer point that throws dust is also one where rock strikes and slides across a chute.

The wear locations to plan for in abrasive service include:

  • Transfer chutes and loading points, where falling material strikes the chute face and then slides along it onto the receiving belt.
  • Skirt boards and belt-edge seals, where fines are trapped between steel, rubber, and the moving belt in a metal–quartz–rubber contact of the kind the 2021 test-stand study simulated.
  • Screw conveyor flights and troughs, where the material is pushed along the steel continuously.
  • Drag-chain flights, chain, and sprockets, and bucket-elevator buckets and boot sections, where material is dug, dragged, or thrown.
  • Crusher feed hoppers and grizzlies, where the heaviest lumps land.

Designing for these locations means bolted, replaceable liners at the impact and sliding faces, access doors sized for the liner plates, and structure that carries the liner weight, so that restoring wear allowance is a planned liner change rather than a weld repair on the chute itself (Nuruldaeva et al. 2025, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering vol. 15 no. 3, pp. 415-426; Romek et al. 2021, Materials vol. 14 no. 15, 4323).

What does hardfacing buy on conveyor steel in quartz-bearing service?​

In the test-stand study cited here, surface treatment reduced abrasive wear by a measured amount, not by an order of magnitude. Romek and colleagues pad-welded (hardfaced) the surface layer of metal conveyor elements with three different electrodes and compared their wear on a test stand, in metal–quartz sand–rubber conditions, against an untreated base element. The average wear of samples padded with one of the three electrodes, electrode 3, was about 25% lower than that of untreated samples.

A short calculation shows what that means for a maintenance interval. Assume:

  • An untreated element loses section at a steady wear rate W and is replaced when it has lost an allowable depth d, so its life is L₀ = d ÷ W.
  • The hardfaced element has the same allowable wear depth and a wear rate 25% lower, 0.75 W.
  • The service conditions match the test conditions, which a bench test does not guarantee.

The hardfaced element's life is L₁ = d ÷ (0.75 W) = 1.33 L₀, a third longer than the untreated element's, under those assumptions. The result is useful but modest, and it depends on electrode choice: the 25% figure is reported for one of the three electrodes tested, not for hardfacing in general. For a plant, the decision is whether a third longer interval between replacements, and the downtime it avoids, justifies the cost of hardfacing, compared with bolted wear liners that are replaced on a schedule. The study's authors state that the results are important not only for belt conveyor elements but also for other machine parts where reducing abrasive wear is desirable (Romek et al. 2021, Materials vol. 14 no. 15, 4323).

Why are cleaning and blockage clearing the dangerous tasks in abrasive bulk handling?​

Abrasive bulk handling also produces spillage, buildup, and blockages, and clearing them puts people in places that normal operation does not. In an analysis of 172 U.S. mining maintenance and repair fatalities from 2002 to 2011, cleaning, defined as removing spillage or excess material, accounted for 29 deaths (16.9%), and removing blockages, defined as removing material that blocks the flow of other material, accounted for 23 (13.4%). Together these two tasks occurred in about 30% of the fatalities.

The authors describe the circumstances:

  • Many victims came into contact with an operating machine, for example while cleaning around an operating conveyor belt.
  • Others failed to use proper personal protective equipment and fell from height or were engulfed by material, for example falling into material while removing a blockage from a crusher. Engulfment by material caused 9 of the 172 maintenance deaths (5.2%).
  • Missing safety equipment, particularly conveyor guards and barriers at unguarded openings, contributed to many of them.

Their recommendation is that all conveyor guards be kept in place while a conveyor operates, as 30 CFR 56.14112 requires, and that cleaning be done with the conveyor de-energized and locked out if a guard is not present. As engineering reasoning, the cleaning and blockage record points a designer toward skirting, spill plates, and cleanout doors that can be serviced from outside the guarded envelope, and toward chutes shaped and lined so they plug less often (Reardon et al. 2014, IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors vol. 2 no. 1, pp. 27-38, Tables 1 and 2; MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.14112).

How must bins, hoppers, and chutes be built so no one has to enter them?​

Section 56.16002, which Part 57 repeats in the same words as 57.16002, covers bins, hoppers, silos, tanks, and surge piles. Bins, hoppers, silos, tanks, and surge piles where loose, unconsolidated materials are stored, handled, or transferred must be:

  • Equipped with mechanical devices or other effective means of handling materials, so that during normal operations persons are not required to enter or work where they are exposed to entrapment by caving or sliding material.
  • Equipped with supply and discharge operating controls, located so that spills or overruns will not endanger persons.

Where persons must move around or over these facilities, suitable walkways or passageways are required. Where persons must enter for maintenance or inspection, ladders, platforms, or staging must be provided, and no one may enter until the supply and discharge of materials have ceased and the supply and discharge equipment is locked out. Anyone entering must wear a safety belt or harness with a lifeline suitably fastened, and a second person, similarly equipped, must be stationed near the lifeline's fastening point and keep it adjusted with minimum slack.

The first requirement is a design requirement. As engineering reasoning, abrasive, damp, or fine ores that arch or rat-hole in a bin need a handling means built into the bin, such as a properly sized outlet and feeder, flow-aid devices, or access for mechanical rodding from outside, so that clearing a hang-up is not an entry task. The second places the controls: a feeder or gate control mounted where the operator is below the outlet or in the path of an overrun would not meet the rule (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.16002; MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026, §57.16002).

What warnings and lockout apply when crushers, feeders, and conveyors restart after wear service?​

Abrasive service can mean frequent short stops for liner changes, chute repairs, and cleanup, and, as engineering reasoning, each restart is a hazard point. Part 56 sets the restart rules:

  • Crusher and mobile equipment starts. Before starting crushers or moving self-propelled mobile equipment, operators must sound a warning audible above the surrounding noise level or use other effective means to warn everyone who could be exposed. Where the crushing and grinding review reports workplace industrial noise of 80 to 105 dB, a horn chosen for a quiet building may not meet that test, and, as a design approach, visual beacons and a start delay are added.
  • Conveyor starts and lockout. Part 56's conveyor start-warning and 30-second re-warning rule applies to each conveyor in the line whose full length is not visible from its starting switch. Its lockout rule for electrically powered equipment, and its rule that repairs be done with the machinery blocked against hazardous motion, apply to every feeder, screw, and conveyor in the line; the mining and mineral processing overview sets them out.

As a design reading, frequent wear stops argue for a lockable disconnect within sight of each feeder, screw, and conveyor drive rather than a single isolation point in a remote motor control center, since MSHA's conveyor guidance prefers that the person doing the work disconnect and lock the power personally (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.12016, §56.14105, §56.14200 and §56.14201; Nuruldaeva et al. 2025, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering vol. 15 no. 3, pp. 415-426; MSHA, Safety Topic: Conveyor Systems, 2026).

What sensing, PLC control, and interlocks does abrasive-service handling need?​

In abrasive service the control system does two jobs: it protects people, as on any mine conveyor, and it measures wear, so that liners and flights are changed on evidence rather than after a hole appears. The intelligence layer can include:

  • Flow and blockage sensing. Plugged-chute switches at transfer points, level sensors in bins and hoppers, and zero-speed sensors on tail pulleys and screw shafts stop the upstream equipment when material stops moving, which, as a design approach, limits how far a blockage builds before someone has to clear it. Tying bin level to feeder control is one way to automate the supply and discharge controls required by 56.16002.
  • Start sequencing and warnings. The PLC runs the crusher and conveyor start warnings and the 30-second conveyor re-warning timer, and, as design practice rather than an MSHA requirement, a downstream-first start order, so a stopped belt is not buried.
  • Wear indicators. Trending drive current on a screw conveyor or drag chain, belt-scale throughput against motor power, and chute-liner thickness readings entered at each inspection give the maintenance system a wear rate for each location. A rising current at constant feed rate is one sign of worn flights or buildup.
  • Drives. A variable-frequency drive gives a loaded conveyor or screw a controlled start and lets the operator run a screw at the lower speed that abrasive classes call for.
  • PLC and safety logic. Logix 5000 controller tasks can be configured as continuous, periodic, or event, and a periodic task executes automatically based on a preconfigured interval, so interlocks can be placed in a periodic task. Emergency stops, pull cords, and guarded-zone functions run on safety-related control parts designed to ISO 13849-1:2023.
  • Standards. ISO 12100:2010 covers the risk assessment that identifies the hazards, ISO 13849-1:2023 covers the design of the safety-related parts of the control system, and IEC 60204-1:2016+AMD1:2021 addresses the machine's electrical equipment from the point of supply connection.

UTEC Industrial, a Rockwell Automation Recognized System Integrator, integrates Allen-Bradley ControlLogix and CompactLogix control, PanelView HMIs, and VFD drives into the handling equipment it builds (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.16002 and §56.14201; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025; ISO 12100:2010; ISO 13849-1:2023; IEC 60204-1:2016+AMD1:2021).

How are wear and equipment condition tracked once an abrasive-service line is running?​

Under Part 56, a competent person must examine each working place at least once each shift, before miners begin work there, for conditions that may adversely affect safety or health, and record the conditions found; in abrasive service the wear record is what gives that examination teeth.

The tuning and monitoring links of the chain turn those examinations into a wear program:

  • Wear-rate records. Liner, flight, and chute thickness readings at fixed points, logged against tonnage, give a wear rate in thickness per thousand tons for each location, and the next change can be scheduled from it.
  • Condition trends. Drive current, bearing temperature, and gearbox vibration on screws, drag chains, and conveyor drives are trended on the PLC or a historian, so a seizing bearing or a worn flight can show up before a trip.
  • Tuning. VFD acceleration and speed settings are rechecked when the ore changes, since a more abrasive ore may call for a slower screw or a gentler start; where a servo axis drives a gate or diverter, the Kinetix 5700 procedure includes a tuning step for each axis, and autotuned loop bandwidths can require adjustment once the motor and load are connected.
  • Stop-device tests. Plugged-chute switches and zero-speed sensors in abrasive, dusty service can be packed with fines; a scheduled, logged test catches a switch that no longer trips.

One failure mode to design against is the wear part that is inspected but never measured, so each change comes as a surprise; a thickness trend makes it a scheduled event (MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.18002; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, Kinetix 5700).

What should a plant define before requesting abrasive-service handling equipment?​

A request that states only tons per hour and conveyor length leaves out much of what drives the design of abrasive-service equipment. A complete specification from the plant defines:

  • Material description: ore or mineral type, bulk density, lump size, moisture, and abrasiveness, stated in the terms of the ANSI/CEMA 550-2020 classification, with a sample available for testing where the material is unfamiliar.
  • Duty: feed rate, operating hours per year, and the ore variations expected over the equipment's life.
  • Wear strategy: target intervals between liner or flight changes, the choice between hardfacing and bolted replaceable liners at each wear location, and the access needed for each change.
  • Storage and transfer points: bin and hopper flow aids, cleanout provisions, and control locations that meet 56.16002, so no one needs to enter during normal operation.
  • Controls and sensing: PLC platform, flow and blockage sensing, start warnings audible above measured plant noise, wear and condition trending, and integration with the plant control system.
  • Acceptance: factory and site tests, including functional tests of every stop device, warning, and interlock.

Along the build chain, the welded chutes, screw troughs, and frames of abrasive-service equipment can carry both the material and sustained vibration, and, as engineering reasoning, weld fatigue and stress relief then matter alongside wear allowance. UTEC Industrial stress-relieves and machines welded frames in-house and performs factory acceptance testing and on-site commissioning, so the specified interlocks are demonstrated before equipment ships (ANSI/CEMA 550-2020; ANSI/CEMA 350-2021; MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026, §56.16002 and §56.14200).

Related Articles

References​

  • ANSI/CEMA 550-2020: Classification and Definitions of Bulk Materials. Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association, 2020.
  • ANSI/CEMA 350-2021: Screw Conveyors for Bulk Materials. Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association, 2021.
  • Romek D, Ulbrich D, Selech J, Kowalczyk J, Wlad R (2021). "Assessment of Padding Elements Wear of Belt Conveyors Working in Combination of Rubber-Quartz-Metal Condition." Materials, 14(15), 4323. DOI 10.3390/ma14154323
  • Nuruldaeva, G., Isakhanova, A., Kumar, D., Kumar, B. (2025). "Occupational Hazards in Mineral Ore Crushing and Grinding: A Literature Review." International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 15(3), 415-426. DOI 10.18280/ijsse.150302.
  • Reardon LM, Heberger JR, Dempsey PG (2014). "Analysis of Fatalities During Maintenance and Repair Operations in the U.S. Mining Sector." IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 2(1), 27-38. DOI 10.1080/21577323.2014.911222
  • MSHA 30 CFR Part 56-2026: Safety and Health Standards—Surface Metal and Nonmetal Mines. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026.
  • MSHA 30 CFR Part 57-2026: Safety and Health Standards—Underground Metal and Nonmetal Mines. U.S. Department of Labor, 2026.
  • MSHA. Safety Topic: Conveyor Systems. Mine Safety and Health Administration, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
  • IEC 60204-1:2016+AMD1:2021 CSV (Ed. 6.1): Safety of Machinery -- Electrical Equipment of Machines -- Part 1: General Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2021.
  • ISO 12100:2010: Safety of machinery — General principles for design — Risk assessment and risk reduction. ISO, 2010.
  • ISO 13849-1:2023: Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems — Part 1: General principles for design. International Organization for Standardization, 2023.
  • Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025: Logix 5000 Controllers Design Considerations. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
  • Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018): Kinetix 5700 Servo Drives User Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2018.

Ready to Discuss a Material Handling System?​

UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for heavy industry, from the stress-relieved structure and drives to the Allen-Bradley PLC controls, tuning, and monitoring that run them, at its Spokane Valley, WA facility. Send UTEC the application, loads, and duty cycle to start a system review.

Request a Quote →

Questions? Call (509) 922-1832 or email sales@utec.co

Last updated on