The Ten Principles of Material Handling Applied to Custom Heavy Equipment

The Ten Principles of Material Handling are the Material Handling Institute's guidelines to consider when designing a material handling system: Planning, Standardization, Work, Ergonomic, Unit Load, Space Utilization, System, Automation, Environmental, and Life Cycle Cost. UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for aerospace and heavy industry from its Spokane Valley, WA facility, integrating Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control with in-house CNC machining, heat treating, and stress relief. This article restates each principle from MHI's own documents, with its definition and key points, and then sets out, as labelled engineering reasoning, what each one asks of a one-off heavy machine such as a coil car, a weld positioner, or a lumber transfer. It closes with the sensing and controls layer and with where each principle falls along the build chain: design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring.

What are the Ten Principles of Material Handling, and who publishes them?

The Material Handling Institute (MHI) publishes the Ten Principles of Material Handling as an undated brochure and as a slide set that its College-Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE) distributes as an educational resource. The CICMHE describes the principles as providing guidelines to consider when designing material handling systems. In the slide set, each of the ten principles, from Planning to Life Cycle Cost, has a one-sentence statement, a definition, and a list of key points.

MHI's online glossary defines a principle as "a general rule, fundamental, or other statement of an observed truth." It says the material handling principles "are often useful in analyzing, planning and managing material handling activities and systems" and serve as a starting point to identifying potential problems and assessing need. The glossary lists the ninth principle as "Environment"; the brochure and the slides both call it the Environmental Principle. Kay's North Carolina State University course notes restate all ten; they note that there are no definite "rules" for designing an effective material handling system and present the ten, as compiled by CIC-MHE in cooperation with MHI, as a distillation of many years of accumulated experience (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure; MHI 2026, Ten Principles slides; MHI Glossary 2022, Material Handling Principles; Kay 2012, §1, Principles of Material Handling).

Why do the principles matter for custom heavy equipment and not only for warehouses?

MHI's glossary defines material handling as the movement, storage, control and protection of materials, goods and products throughout manufacturing, distribution, consumption and disposal, with the focus on "the methods, mechanical equipment, systems and related controls" used to do it. That definition names controls alongside mechanical equipment, and it covers manufacturing as well as distribution. In a facilities-planning textbook, Tompkins, White, Bozer and Tanchoco state that between 20 and 50% of the total operating expenses within manufacturing is attributed to material handling, and that "it is generally agreed" that effective facilities planning can reduce these costs by at least 10 to 30%. The book states these figures for manufacturing in general, and its §5.3, "Material Handling Principles," begins on p. 179.

The MHI statements are written for material handling systems in general and do not give a separate version for heavy or one-off machines. As engineering reasoning, they still apply where a single transfer car, positioner, or conveyor is the whole handling system for one part family. How heavy in-plant handling differs from warehouse handling in load, temperature, and duty is covered in Industrial vs. Warehouse Material Handling for Heavy, Hot Loads (MHI Glossary 2022, Material Handling; Tompkins et al. 2010, §1.2 p. 10 and Contents).

How does the Planning Principle apply to a one-off heavy machine?

The Planning Principle states that all material handling should be the result of a deliberate plan in which the needs, performance objectives, and functional specification of the proposed methods are completely defined at the outset. MHI defines a plan as a prescribed course of action defined in advance of implementation; in its simplest form, a material handling plan defines the material (what) and the moves (when and where), and together they define the method (how and who). The key points include:

• Success in planning large-scale material handling projects "generally requires a team approach" involving suppliers, consultants when appropriate, and end-user specialists from management, engineering, computer and information systems, finance, and operations.
• The plan should document existing methods and problems, physical and economic constraints, and future requirements and goals.
• The plan should promote concurrent engineering of product, process design, process layout, and material handling methods, as opposed to independent and sequential design practices.

Kay sets a condition on the criterion for selecting a handling system. If a completely new facility and production process is being designed, total cost of production is the most appropriate criterion, and the lowest-cost handling system may not result in the lowest total cost of production. If it is too costly even to consider changing the basic layout and production process, handling-system cost is the only criterion that need be considered.

As engineering reasoning, the "functional specification" for a custom heavy machine is its user requirement specification, covered in Writing a User Requirement Specification (URS) for Custom Machinery. ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 specifies required processes for engineering activities that result in requirements for systems and software products. UTEC Industrial performs factory acceptance testing (FAT) and on-site commissioning, where requirements set in the plan can be demonstrated on the built machine (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 1; Kay 2012, §1, Design of MH Systems; ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018).

What does the Standardization Principle mean when every machine is custom?

The Standardization Principle states that material handling methods, equipment, controls, and software should be standardized within the limits of achieving overall performance objectives and without sacrificing needed flexibility, modularity, and throughput. MHI defines standardization as less variety and customization in the methods and equipment employed. The key points say that the planner should select methods and equipment that can perform a variety of tasks under a variety of operating conditions and in anticipation of changing future requirements. They also say standardization applies to the sizes of containers and other load-forming components as well as to operating procedures and equipment, and that "Standardization, flexibility and modularity must not be incompatible."

The principle names controls and software alongside equipment, and it sets two limits on standardizing: overall performance objectives, and the flexibility, modularity, and throughput the operation needs. As engineering reasoning, applied to a one-off heavy machine:

• The frame, tooling, and fixtures are sized to the part and stay custom; the drive family, controller family, network, HMI conventions, bearings, and fasteners can still be standardized across a plant's machines.
• One failure mode is the single-source spare: a one-off drive or controller that no other machine on site uses, whose failure stops the machine until a replacement arrives.
• Modularity can sit at the interface: a family of fixtures with one shared mounting and one shared I/O connection lets a single positioner or car serve several part numbers.

The spare-parts cost side of standardization is worked in Total Cost of Ownership and ROI for Custom Material Handling. UTEC Industrial builds UL 508A control panels around Allen-Bradley ControlLogix and CompactLogix controllers (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 2; MHI 2026, Ten Principles slides, Standardization Principle).

How is material handling work measured, and how does the Work Principle apply to heavy loads?

The Work Principle states that material handling work should be minimized without sacrificing productivity or the level of service required of the operation. MHI defines the measure of work as material handling flow (volume, weight, or count per unit of time) multiplied by the distance moved. The key points include:

• Simplifying processes by reducing, combining, shortening, or eliminating unnecessary moves will reduce work.
• Consider each pickup and set-down, or placing material in and out of storage, as a distinct move and a component of the distance moved.
• Where possible, gravity should be used to move materials or to assist their movement, "while respecting consideration of safety and the potential for product damage."
• The shortest distance between two points is a straight line.

NIOSH gives a parallel instruction for manual handling: combine operations and processes whenever possible to reduce or eliminate unnecessary manual handling of materials and products.

As engineering reasoning, applied to heavy loads:

• With flow measured by weight, the work measure has units such as tons per hour times feet, and doubling the weight per move doubles it over the same distance.
• A weldment lifted onto a fixture for welding, lifted off for inspection, and set back for repair makes six separate moves. A positioner that holds it through welding and inspection removes four of them.
• Gravity on a heavy load is stored energy. The principle's own condition, safety and product damage, points to braked or powered descent rather than free-rolling sections for heavy parts.
• A straight, rail-guided path between two stations applies the straight-line key point (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 3; NIOSH 2007-131, p. 13).

What does the Ergonomic Principle ask of equipment that no person could lift?

The Ergonomic Principle states that human capabilities and limitations must be recognized and respected in the design of material handling tasks and equipment to ensure safe and effective operations. MHI defines ergonomics as the science that seeks to adapt work or working conditions to suit the abilities of the worker. The key points say that equipment should be selected that eliminates repetitive and strenuous manual labor and effectively interacts with human operators and users; that the principle embraces both physical and mental tasks; and that the workplace and the equipment must be designed to be safe for people.

NIOSH's Ergonomic Guidelines for Manual Material Handling is written for managers and supervisors in industries that involve the manual handling of containers: rectangular, square, and cylindrical containers, sacks, and bags. Within that scope, it says administrative improvements such as job rotation may still expose workers to risk factors, and that the most effective way to eliminate "problem jobs" is to change them, through appropriate engineering improvements with work practices modified accordingly. For loads that are unstable and/or heavy, it lists using mechanical devices or equipment to lift the load, and team lifting as a temporary measure for heavy or bulky objects. OSHA's guidance booklet lists installing a mechanical lifting aid among the controls that ergonomic principles may require in materials handling and storing. The NIOSH lifting equation and its 51 lb load constant are worked in Industrial vs. Warehouse Material Handling for Heavy, Hot Loads.

ISO 6385:2016 establishes the fundamental principles of ergonomics as basic guidelines for the design of work systems, which involve combinations of workers and equipment, with examples that include a machine operator and machine. It applies ergonomic principles through all phases of the work system's life cycle, from conception to decommissioning.

As engineering reasoning, applied to a heavy machine whose load is not lifted by hand:

• The physical side of the principle applies to the tasks around the load: rigging, fixture changeover, lubrication, and maintenance access.
• The mental side applies to the operator's pendant and HMI: clear interlock status, alarm text that names the cause, and one consistent layout across machines (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 4; NIOSH 2007-131, pp. 6, 9-10 and 18; OSHA 2236, p. 16; ISO 6385:2016).

How does the Unit Load Principle apply when the part is its own unit load?

The Unit Load Principle states that unit loads shall be appropriately sized and configured in a way that achieves the material flow and inventory objectives at each stage in the supply chain. MHI defines a unit load as one that can be stored or moved as a single entity at one time, such as a pallet, container, or tote, regardless of the number of individual items that make up the load. The key points include:

• Less effort and work is required to collect and move many individual items as a single load than to move many items one at a time.
• "Large unit loads are common both pre and post manufacturing in the form of raw materials and finished goods."
• During manufacturing, smaller unit loads, including as few as one item, yield less in-process inventory and shorter item throughput times.

MHI's glossary gives large-load examples. Its Unit Load AGV entry describes a vehicle carrying a discrete load such as an individual item, for example a large roll of paper, a coil of steel, or an automobile engine. Its Unit Load AS/RS entry describes machines that store large loads, "usually 1,000+ pounds," typically on pallets. Kay's unit-load definition, the ways of restraining a unit load, and the unit-load versus bulk-solids split are set out in Unit-Load vs. Bulk-Solids Handling: The CEMA Split and Why It Drives Design.

As engineering reasoning, the "as few as one item" key point fits the self-restraining heavy parts listed in the unit-load article, handled singly; the unit-load design is then the device's interface to the part itself: the mandrel, cradle, lifting points, or clamps that engage it (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 5; MHI Glossary 2022, Unit Load AGV and Unit Load AS/RS).

How does the Space Utilization Principle point toward overhead handling?

The Space Utilization Principle states that effective and efficient use must be made of all available space. MHI defines space in material handling as three-dimensional, and therefore counted as cubic space. The key points say that cluttered and unorganized spaces and blocked aisles should be eliminated in work areas; that in storage areas, the objective of maximizing storage density must be balanced against accessibility and selectivity; and that when transporting loads within a facility, the use of overhead space should be considered as an option.

Overhead and gantry cranes are regulated under OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179, and ASME B30.2-2022 covers overhead and gantry cranes with a top-running bridge and trolley hoist. Crane and aisle clearance rules are listed in the industrial-versus-warehouse article linked above, and the CICMHE selection guide's comparison of cranes, conveyors, and trucks is summarized in the unit-load article.

As engineering reasoning, in a heavy bay the floor is taken up by the process: furnaces, machine tools, quench tanks, and pits. An overhead crane or monorail uses the cubic space above that equipment, while a floor-running transfer car uses floor space for a fixed, guarded path (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 6; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016; ASME B30.2-2022; Peters et al. 1998, General Considerations).

How does the System Principle tie physical flow to information flow?

The System Principle states that material movement and storage activities should be fully integrated to form a coordinated, operational system spanning receiving, inspection, storage, production, assembly, packaging, unitizing, order selection, shipping, transportation, and the handling of returns. MHI defines a system as a collection of interacting and/or interdependent entities that form a unified whole. The key points include:

• Information flow and physical material flow should be integrated and treated as concurrent activities.
• Methods should be provided for easily identifying materials and products, for determining their location and status within facilities and within the supply chain, and for controlling their movement.
• Customer requirements and expectations regarding quantity, quality, and on-time delivery should be met without exception.

MHI's glossary entry for Integrated Systems & Controls says an integrated system "generally refers to at least one of the three possible characteristics" of an installed system: automation of the information flow concurrently with the physical flow; an unbroken, highly coordinated material-flow link between successive stages, with continuous flow emphasized; and the interfacing of two or more handling devices to bridge work stations, aiming at a high degree of mechanical coordination and precise timing of movements.

As engineering reasoning, in a custom heavy line the PLC is where those three characteristics meet: a part's serial or heat number travels with it from car to positioner to conveyor, each handoff is interlocked, and the controls record each part's location and state (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 7; MHI 2026, Ten Principles slides, System Principle; MHI Glossary 2022, Integrated Systems & Controls).

What does the Automation Principle require before a heavy handling task is automated?

The Automation Principle states, in MHI's slide set, that material handling operations should be mechanized and/or automated where feasible to improve operational efficiency, increase responsiveness, improve consistency and predictability, decrease operating costs, and eliminate repetitive or potentially unsafe manual labor. The slides define automation as a technology concerned with the application of electro-mechanical devices, electronics, and computer-based systems to operate and control production and service activities, and say it suggests the linking of multiple mechanical operations to create a system that can be controlled by programmed instructions. The key points include:

• Pre-existing processes and methods should be simplified and/or re-engineered before any efforts at installing mechanized or automated systems.
• All items expected to be handled automatically must have features that accommodate mechanized and automated handling.
• All interface issues should be treated as critical to successful automation, including equipment to equipment, equipment to load, equipment to operator, and control communications.

Robot versus purpose-built mechanism is covered in When Does a Robot Beat a Custom Mechanism for Heavy Material Handling?. Where a robot is chosen, ANSI/A3 R15.06-2025 is the U.S. national adoption of ISO 10218 Parts 1 and 2, and ISO 10218-2:2025 sets safety requirements for industrial robot applications and robot cells.

As engineering reasoning, the "features that accommodate" key point reaches back into the part and fixture design: a heavy casting or weldment needs locating datums and gripping or lifting features before a robot or a mechanism can engage it the same way every cycle. The "simplify first" key point is a warning against one failure mode: automating a manual sequence's unnecessary moves along with its necessary ones. UTEC Industrial integrates FANUC robotic cells, including vision, with a FANUC design and engineering partner (MHI 2026, Ten Principles slides, Automation Principle; ANSI/A3 R15.06-2025; ISO 10218-2:2025).

How do the Environmental Principle's energy and hazard points apply to heavy plants?

The Environmental Principle states that environmental impact and energy consumption should be considered as criteria when designing or selecting alternative equipment and material handling systems. MHI defines environmental consciousness as stemming from a desire not to waste natural resources and to predict and eliminate the possible negative effects of daily actions on the environment. The key points say that containers, pallets, and other products used to form and protect unit loads should be designed for reusability when possible and/or biodegradability as appropriate; that systems design should accommodate the handling of spent dunnage, empty containers, and other by-products of material handling; and that materials specified as hazardous have special needs with regard to spill protection, combustibility, and other risks.

The energy criterion is worked for handling drives, with the US Department of Energy's motor-cost example, in Total Cost of Ownership and ROI for Custom Material Handling. For combustibility, NFPA 660-2025 is the NFPA's Standard for Combustible Dusts and Particulate Solids.

As engineering reasoning, applied to heavy plants:

• In lumber, biomass, and aluminum plants, the combustibility key point reaches the handling equipment through dust that settles on conveyors, drives, and enclosures.
• On positioners, tilting devices, and cars with hydraulic power units, the spill-protection key point applies to the hydraulic fluid as well as to the product (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 9; NFPA 660-2025).

How does the Life Cycle Cost Principle fit, and where is it worked in detail?

The Life Cycle Cost Principle states that a thorough economic analysis should account for the entire life cycle of all material handling equipment and resulting systems. Its definition and cost elements are summarized in Life Cycle of a Custom Material Handling System: Concept to Decommissioning, and the discounting method is worked in the total-cost-of-ownership article linked above. The listed cost elements include setup and equipment programming, training, and system testing and acceptance; as engineering reasoning, on a custom machine those three fall largely on the controls layer and the acceptance tests.

Tompkins and colleagues write that the facilities planning process is best understood in the context of a facility life cycle: a facility is planned only once but frequently replanned, and the cycle continues until the facility is torn down.

The principle's key points also call for a long-range plan for replacing the equipment when it becomes obsolete. IEC 62402:2019, Obsolescence management, covers developing an obsolescence management plan and strategies to minimize obsolescence during design. As engineering reasoning, on a heavy machine the welded structure can outlast its controls, and a replacement plan can treat the controller, drives, and HMI as items to be replaced within the structure's service life (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 10; Tompkins et al. 2010, §1.4 p. 13; IEC 62402:2019).

Which principles govern the sensing and controls layer of a heavy handling machine?

Four principles name controls, software, information flow, or programming in their own words:

• Standardization: methods, equipment, controls, and software should be standardized within the principle's limits.
• System: information flow and physical flow should be concurrent, with methods for identifying materials, determining their location and status, and controlling their movement.
• Automation: the definition's system can be controlled by programmed instructions, and the key points list control communications among the critical interfaces.
• Life Cycle Cost: the cost elements include setup and equipment programming.

The Ergonomic Principle adds that it embraces mental tasks as well as physical ones. As engineering reasoning, the operator's HMI is where that key point meets the controls, and a custom heavy machine applies these principles in layers. Encoders and limit switches report where each axis is; load cells report what it carries; zone interlocks hold a move until the path, doors, and guarded areas are clear; VFD and servo drives ramp the load; and the PLC sequences each move and enforces its permissives.

In Logix 5000 controllers, controller tasks can be configured as continuous, periodic, or event, and a periodic task performs a function at a specific time interval. The Kinetix 5700 servo drive manual lists DSL and Hiperface encoder feedback, position-loop, velocity-loop, and torque-loop axis configurations with a current regulator loop, and hardwired and integrated safe torque-off on the drive variants it names; it states that safe torque-off does not provide physical isolation of the electrical output that is required for some applications.

Two standards apply to this layer. IEC 60204-1:2016 applies to electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic equipment and systems to machines not portable by hand while working. ISO 13849-1:2023 specifies a methodology and provides related requirements, recommendations and guidance for the design and integration of safety-related parts of control systems that perform safety functions, for high demand and continuous modes of operation; it does not apply to low demand mode of operation. UTEC Industrial, a Rockwell Automation Recognized System Integrator, integrates Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control into the handling systems it builds (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principles 2, 4, 7 and 10; MHI 2026, Ten Principles slides, Automation Principle; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025, Ch. 5 pp. 39 and 41; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, pp. 16, 241, 250 and App. D; IEC 60204-1:2016; ISO 13849-1:2023).

Where does each principle land along the design-to-monitoring build chain?

A custom heavy machine is built along one chain: design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring. The MHI documents do not map the principles to these steps. The table below is engineering reasoning: for each principle, the chain links where it is decided and a question for the request for quotation (RFQ).

Principle	Chain links where it is decided	Question for the RFQ
Planning	Design, engineering	Are the part envelope, duty, path, interfaces, and acceptance tests defined?
Standardization	Engineering, drives, controls	Do the drive, controller, network, and HMI families match the plant's spares?
Work	Design, engineering	How many pickups and set-downs does each part see, and which can be removed?
Ergonomic	Design, controls	What is still done by hand, and what does the HMI show?
Unit Load	Design, parts machining	At which locating and lifting features does the device engage the part?
Space Utilization	Design, engineering	Is the move overhead or on the floor, and what aisles and clearances does it keep?
System	Controls, monitoring	How are part identity, location, and status tracked and handed off between machines?
Automation	Design, controls, tuning	Has the manual sequence been simplified first, and are all four interface types defined?
Environmental	Drives, controls	How are the drives sized and ramped for the duty, and how are dust and spills handled?
Life Cycle Cost	Fabrication, weld fatigue, stress relief, monitoring	What are the design life, maintenance plan, spares list, and controls replacement plan?

Two sources bear on the later links. The Life Cycle Cost key points call for a preventive and predictive maintenance plan for the equipment, with the estimated cost of maintenance and spare parts included in the economic analysis; as engineering reasoning, the monitoring link is where that plan is carried out in service. At the tuning link, Rockwell's Kinetix 5700 manual states that actual bandwidth values, in hertz, depend on the application and can require adjustment once the motor and load are connected. As engineering reasoning, the structural links set the design life that the life-cycle analysis assumes; Stress Relief for Machine Bases and Frames Before Final Machining and VSR Applications: Weldments, Machine Frames, and Oversize Assemblies cover that step. UTEC Industrial stress-relieves welded structures, including by automated vibratory stress relief, and machines to tolerances as tight as ±0.001 in (MHI 2026, Ten Principles brochure, Principle 10; Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P, p. 211).

Related Articles

• Unit-Load vs. Bulk-Solids Handling: The CEMA Split and Why It Drives Design — the unit-load and bulk classes the principles are applied to
• Life Cycle of a Custom Material Handling System: Concept to Decommissioning — applying the principles at each stage of a system's life
• Writing a User Requirement Specification (URS) for Custom Machinery — turning the planning principle into written requirements
• Total Cost of Ownership and ROI for Custom Material Handling — the life-cycle cost principle worked as TCO and ROI
• When Does a Robot Beat a Custom Mechanism for Heavy Material Handling? — the automation principle: when a robot or a mechanism fits

References

• Material Handling Institute. The Ten Principles of Material Handling. MHI, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
• Material Handling Institute. The Ten Principles of Material Handling (presentation slides). MHI College-Industry Council on Material Handling Education, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
• MHI. MHI Glossary (online), entries dated December 31, 2022. MHI, 2022 (web documentation, accessed September 2026).
• Kay MG. Material Handling Equipment (course notes). Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2012.
• Tompkins JA, White JA, Bozer YA, Tanchoco JMA. Facilities Planning, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
• ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018: Systems and software engineering — Life cycle processes — Requirements engineering. ISO/IEC/IEEE, 2018.
• NIOSH. Ergonomic Guidelines for Manual Material Handling, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2007-131. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007.
• OSHA 2236: Materials Handling and Storage, 2002 (Revised). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 2002.
• ISO 6385:2016: Ergonomics principles in the design of work systems. ISO, 2016 (Ed.3).
• OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179-2016: Overhead and Gantry Cranes. U.S. Department of Labor, 2016.
• ASME B30.2-2022: Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Single or Multiple Girder, Top Running Trolley Hoist). ASME, 2022.
• Peters BA (ed.), Malmborg C, Petrina G, Pratt D, Taylor D. An Introduction to Material Handling Equipment Selection. College-Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE), Material Handling Institute, 1998.
• ANSI/A3 R15.06-2025: American National Standard for Industrial Robots and Robot Systems – Safety Requirements. A3/ANSI, 2025.
• ISO 10218-2:2025: Robotics — Safety requirements — Part 2: Industrial robot applications and robot cells. ISO, 2025.
• NFPA 660-2025: Standard for Combustible Dusts and Particulate Solids. National Fire Protection Association, 2025.
• IEC 62402:2019: Obsolescence management. IEC, 2019 (Ed.2).
• Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025: Logix 5000 Controllers Design Considerations. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
• Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018): Kinetix 5700 Servo Drives User Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2018.
• IEC 60204-1:2016 (Ed. 6.0): Safety of Machinery -- Electrical Equipment of Machines -- Part 1: General Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2016.
• ISO 13849-1:2023: Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems — Part 1: General principles for design. International Organization for Standardization, 2023.

---

Ready to Discuss a Material Handling System?

UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for heavy industry, from the stress-relieved structure and drives to the Allen-Bradley PLC controls, tuning, and monitoring that run them, at its Spokane Valley, WA facility. Send UTEC the application, loads, and duty cycle to start a system review.

Request a Quote →

Questions? Call (509) 922-1832 or email sales@utec.co