Designing Handling Fixtures for Thermal-Vacuum and Cleanroom Environments
A handling fixture that goes into a thermal-vacuum (TVAC) chamber or an integration cleanroom with flight hardware has to be designed from its materials outward: every polymer, finish, lubricant, bearing, and bolted joint either survives vacuum and temperature swings cleanly or becomes a contamination or alignment problem for the article it holds. UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for aerospace and heavy industry from its Spokane Valley, WA facility, integrating Allen-Bradley PLC and motion control with in-house CNC machining, heat treating, and stress relief. This article covers fixture-level design choices, from outgassing and bakeout to lubricants, bearings, cold welding, and thermal contraction, and points to companion articles for cleanroom classes, ESD, and chamber operations. Like any handling system, the fixture is built along one chain, design → engineering → parts machining → fabrication → assembly → weld fatigue → stress relief → drives → controls → tuning → monitoring, and in a vacuum chamber the material and lubricant decisions made at the first link are the ones that cannot be corrected later.
What makes a thermal-vacuum fixture different from an ordinary cleanroom fixture?
A cleanroom fixture has to avoid shedding particles and residue in air at room temperature. A fixture that also enters a thermal-vacuum chamber has to do that under vacuum, while its lubricants evaporate and its steel and aluminum parts shrink or grow at different rates. Room-level requirements (ISO cleanroom classes, surface cleanliness, ESD grounding) are covered in Cleanroom and ESD Requirements for Handling Equipment, and chamber operations (the declared material list, the pre-test chamber run) in Test-Facility Handling: Thermal-Vacuum and Anechoic Chambers. This article works at the fixture's own parts.
NASA-STD-5005D sets the principle for ground support equipment: materials and processes in GSE that interfaces with flight hardware are controlled to prevent damage to or contamination of that hardware. Its guidance lists properties that should be considered in material selection, and four of them are the subject of this article:
- Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch between joined parts, which loads joints and shifts interfaces as temperature changes
- Vacuum outgassing of polymers, finishes, and lubricants
- Fretting and galling at contacting metal surfaces
- Electrostatic discharge, handled in the cleanroom companion article
ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, the European standard for the thermal-vacuum outgassing screening test, reaches the same equipment from the materials side: its scope covers materials proposed for spacecraft and associated equipment, for vacuum facilities used for flight hardware tests, and for certain launcher hardware. As engineering reasoning, the failure mode at this level is the room-temperature fixture: a design checked only for load at 20 °C in air, whose grease, paint, and bolted aluminum-to-steel joints then misbehave in the chamber (NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6; ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, 2008, Scope).
How are fixture materials screened for outgassing before they enter a chamber?
One first screen is NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's outgassing database. Its data come from the test the guide identifies as ASTM E 595, cited here at ASTM E595-15(2021), which reports total mass loss (TML) and collected volatile condensable materials (CVCM); the test conditions and the historical 1.00 percent TML and 0.10 percent CVCM screening levels are set out in Cleanroom and ESD Requirements for Handling Equipment. The guide's Section C lists only the materials that meet those levels, grouped by use.
ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C describes the European equivalent: nominally 24 hours at 125 °C at 10⁻³ Pa or lower. Its §3.2.6 also defines recovered mass loss (RML), the specimen's mass loss without the absorbed water, as TML minus the water vapor regained (WVR), and notes that RML is introduced because water is not always seen as a critical contaminant in spacecraft materials.
Two cautions apply on a fixture:
- The data are old. The Goddard guide notes that its data were collected over a period of 25 years and that some materials have likely changed over that time, and it says that sometimes batch testing, testing each lot of a material obtained over a lengthy period, should be the prudent course if an application is considered critical.
- Screening is not acceptance. The acceptance limits for materials near sensitive items, which can be tighter than the screening list, come from the program's contamination documents; the cleanroom companion article sets out ECSS-Q-ST-70-01C Rev.1's quantity-scaled limits and its rule that outgassing data older than 10 years is not admissible.
As engineering reasoning, a failure mode follows: a paint, tape, or elastomer chosen because a similar product name appears in the database, whose current formulation was never tested and outgasses above the limits at the pre-test chamber run (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Outgassing Database User Guide, 2025; ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, 2008; ASTM E595-15(2021); ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, 2008, §3.2.6; ECSS-Q-ST-70-01C Rev.1, 2025, §5.2.1.2 e).
When do outgassing screening data stop applying to a fixture that runs hot?
Screening data are taken at one temperature, which a fixture may not live at. ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C states that the nominal screening result is usable for materials whose operational temperature is below 50 °C. Its §5.1 a goes further: a material subjected during the mission to more than 125 °C for hours, or more than 50 °C for weeks, needs dedicated tests at representative, higher temperatures. Reading a fixture's campaign as its mission is engineering reasoning. Its §4.2 adds that whether a screening result is valid depends on the environment and on how close the material sits to sensitive surfaces.
For a fixture, that raises three design questions early:
- What temperature does each material actually reach? A fixture in a chamber with a heated plate, a warm cryoshroud phase, or an article running hot can have parts well above 50 °C for the length of a campaign. NASA Glenn's Space Environments Complex cryoshroud reaches 80 °C at its warm end.
- How long does it stay there? A part held warm across a campaign of several weeks falls into the "weeks above 50 °C" case, not the short-excursion case.
- Where is it relative to the article? A polymer bumper touching an optical bench is judged differently from a cable jacket at the chamber floor.
As engineering reasoning, the failure mode is the cold-screened hot part: a material that passes the 125 °C, 24-hour screen but sits at an elevated temperature for weeks next to a sensitive surface, where its long-term outgassing was never measured (ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, 2008, Introduction, §4.2, and §5.1 a; NASA Glenn Research Center, Space Environments Complex, 2023).
Should a handling fixture be vacuum-baked before it enters the chamber?
It can be, and the flight-hardware documents give the basis. NASA-STD-6016C, NASA's materials and processes standard for spacecraft, reaches ground support and test equipment only to the extent needed to prevent damage to or contamination of flight hardware, which is the fixture's situation. Its requirement MPR 96 states that hardware items containing materials that fail the CVCM requirement, or unidentified materials, are to be vacuum baked, with stated exemptions, and it recommends ASTM E2900 as a guide for the bakeout (the practice is cited below at its 2024 edition, ASTM E2900-24). It also cautions that the 125 °C screening temperature can itself damage some hardware, so the bakeout temperature is chosen for the part, not copied from the screening test.
ASTM E2900-24, the Standard Practice for Spacecraft Hardware Thermal Vacuum Bakeout, is cited here at the level of the standard. Its published scope defines the equipment, environment, and certification criteria for each type of bakeout and describes three bakeout methods: prescribed time-and-pressure criteria, a quartz-crystal-microbalance (QCM) stabilization rate, and a measured QCM deposition rate. The methods are intended to reduce component outgassing rates to the levels contamination-sensitive hardware needs. Its scope names spacecraft and spacecraft components rather than ground equipment, so a fixture bake is the same practice borrowed for hardware that shares the chamber.
Practical consequences for the fixture design:
- Bake-compatible materials. Every material, including elastomer pads, cable jackets, labels, and sensors, has to tolerate the bake temperature.
- Removable non-bakeable items. Items that cannot be baked come off before the bake and go back only if separately qualified.
- Bake before final clean. Handling with ungloved hands or an unscreened lubricant after the bake undoes it.
As engineering reasoning, the failure mode is the fixture that fails its own bake: a sensor, cable, or bumper that cannot survive the bake temperature, discovered when the bake is scheduled a week before the test (NASA-STD-6016C w/Change 1, 2023, §1 and §4.2.3.6 [MPR 96]; ASTM E2900-24, scope).
Which lubricants work on a fixture mechanism under vacuum: dry film or fluid?
A note in the European space-mechanism standard, ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev.2, says vacuum is one of the main concerns regarding lubrication, and a fixture with screws, slides, hinges, or rotating joints inherits the problem whenever it operates in the chamber. The standard is written for flight mechanisms, so it is cited here as practice a vacuum-rated fixture mechanism can borrow, not as a requirement on ground equipment. It also requires fluid-lubricant quantity to account for outgassing and creep.
The trade between the two families is set out in NASA/CR-2005-213424, Jones and Jansen's Lubrication for Space Applications, which NASA-STD-5005D names as a source of guidelines on GSE lubricants:
| Property | Dry (solid film) lubricant | Wet (oil or grease) lubricant |
|---|---|---|
| Vapor pressure | Negligible | Finite |
| Surface migration | Negligible | Sealing required |
| Other listed traits | Short life in moist air | Viscosity, creep, and vapor pressure all temperature dependent |
| Example in space use | Sputtered MoS₂ | Perfluoropolyether (PFPE) fluids and greases |
Two details matter for a fixture:
- PFPE creep. PFPE fluids have unusually low surface tension, about 17 to 25 dyn/cm, so they are more prone to creep than conventional fluids, and low-surface-energy barrier films on bearing lands are used to contain them.
- MoS₂ in air. Sputtered MoS₂ films that run with very low wear in vacuum had a severely limited life when tested in humid air, and a TVAC fixture can operate in air during integration, loading, and removal as well as in vacuum during the test.
NASA-STD-5005D adds three points for GSE lubricants: NASA-TM-86556 should be used to evaluate and select them, with NASA/CR-2005-213424 covering additional lubricants; use near precision-cleaned hardware should be minimized or tightly controlled; and chloro-fluoro lubricants shall not be used with aluminum or magnesium where fretting, vibration, or wear can occur. As engineering reasoning, a failure mode is a fixture lubricated for its air duty only, whose dry film wears out during weeks of integration in air before it ever reaches the vacuum it was chosen for (ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev.2, 2019, §4.7.3.1 b and §4.7.3.3.1 b; Jones and Jansen 2005, NASA/CR-2005-213424, Table 1, §3.2.2, and §4.2; NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6.3.1.5.3).
How does chamber vacuum level set the vapor pressure a fixture lubricant needs?
A fluid lubricant evaporates in vacuum at a rate set by its vapor pressure at its operating temperature, and excessive evaporation raises the risk of lubricant starvation in the mechanism and leaves condensates. A lubricant supplier's PFPE technical brochure gives a practical selection rule: choose a lubricant whose vapor pressure at the service temperature is at least two to three powers of ten below the pressure the chamber's pumps can attain. The same brochure tabulates attainable pressures by pump type, with turbomolecular pumps covering roughly 1 × 10⁻³ to 1 × 10⁻¹¹ torr.
Applied to a thermal-vacuum test pressure, the rule gives a target directly. GSFC-STD-7000B states that, in thermal testing, chamber pressures below 1.33 × 10⁻³ Pa (1 × 10⁻⁵ torr) are usually low enough to keep gaseous conduction negligible:
- Chamber pressure: 1 × 10⁻⁵ torr
- Two powers of ten below: lubricant vapor pressure of 1 × 10⁻⁷ torr or lower at service temperature
- Three powers of ten below: 1 × 10⁻⁸ torr or lower
Two assumptions sit behind that arithmetic. First, the vapor pressure has to be read at the lubricant's actual service temperature, because vapor pressure rises with temperature and a warm mechanism can be the hot spot in a cold chamber. Second, the chamber's attainable pressure, not its specified test pressure, is the right reference when the facility pumps well below the test requirement. As engineering reasoning, a failure mode is choosing a lubricant from a room-temperature vapor-pressure value for a mechanism that runs warm, so it evaporates faster than planned and starves the joint during the test (Klüber Lubrication 2016, B990001402 Edition 11.16, p. 8; GSFC-STD-7000B, 2021, §2.6.2.4.4).
Which bearings and linear guides suit a vacuum or cleanroom fixture?
Rolling bearings and linear guides are chosen by the same two variables as the lubricant: vacuum level and temperature. A bearing manufacturer's special-environment catalog groups its options that way, and the same selection logic can be applied to other suppliers:
| Environment | Bearing and lubricant approach | Stated range |
|---|---|---|
| Cleanroom through vacuum | Stainless bearings packed with fluorine grease | Cleanroom to vacuum service |
| Higher vacuum, room temperature | Coated bearings with a low-outgassing film | Usable to 10⁻⁷ Pa at room temperature; usable vacuum varies with temperature |
| High vacuum and high temperature | Grease-free bearings with MoS₂ solid lubricant | Vacuum to 10⁻⁸ Pa and temperatures up to 350 °C |
The same catalog notes that the coated option gives lower outgassing and lower particle emission than MoS₂-lubricated bearings, which matters when the fixture serves both a cleanroom and a chamber. The choice is therefore a trade between particles in the cleanroom, outgassing in the chamber, and the temperature the bearing reaches.
The fixture designer's job is to write that environment onto the drawing: the lowest pressure, the temperature range at the bearing, the time spent in air versus vacuum, and whether the bearing is in view of a sensitive surface. As engineering reasoning, a failure mode is a standard greased bearing specified by load and speed alone, which meets its catalog rating but outgasses grease in the chamber and sheds wear particles in the cleanroom (NSK Ltd. 2022, CAT. No. E1258e, pp. A47–A53; ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev.2, 2019, §4.7.3.1 b).
How are cold welding and galling avoided at a fixture's sliding and separable contacts?
Metal contacts that must separate after a vacuum exposure can cold-weld or gall, and a fixture has many such contacts: locating pins in bushings, clamp faces, quick-release pins, latch hooks, and threaded adjusters.
ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev.2 sets out the space-mechanism practice, again borrowed rather than imposed on ground equipment:
- Avoid sliding. The use of sliding surfaces is to be avoided (§4.7.3.1 d); on a fixture, rolling elements or flexures can take the motion.
- Use dissimilar pairs. Metal-to-metal sliding contacts are to be made of dissimilar materials (§4.7.3.1 g).
- Harden and coat separable contacts. Except for gears and ball or journal bearings, and unless one surface is self-lubricating, metallic mating or separating surfaces in relative motion should have a hardness of at least 500 HV and be of dissimilar materials, or have a dissimilar coating on at least one surface (§4.7.5.4.5 h).
- Do not rely on that alone. A note to the same clause says dissimilar materials at 500 HV are often not enough to prevent cold welding.
NASA-STD-5005D lists fretting and galling among its GSE material-selection considerations. As engineering reasoning, for a fixture the design consequences are to reduce the number of contacts that must separate after a vacuum exposure, to give each one a coating system that has been qualified for the chamber's materials list, and to plan for inspection of those contacts between campaigns.
As engineering reasoning, a failure mode is a locating pin or clamp that will not release after the test: the article is held by a joint that has cold-welded or galled, and freeing it means applying force next to flight hardware (ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev.2, 2019, §4.7.3.1 d and g and §4.7.5.4.5 h; NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6).
How much does a cold-soaked fixture contract, and why does the mix of metals matter?
Many handling fixtures are steel frames with aluminum parts, or aluminum frames with steel pins and inserts, and each metal contracts by a different amount as it cools. NIST's cryogenic material-property curve fits give the total linear contraction from 293 K (20 °C) down to 4 K:
| Material | Contraction, 293 K to 4 K | NIST curve-fit error |
|---|---|---|
| 304 stainless steel | About −0.30 percent | 5 percent |
| 6061-T6 aluminum | About −0.42 percent | 4 percent |
Worked comparison. Assume a 1,000 mm span between two locating features, one version in 304 stainless steel and one in 6061-T6 aluminum, both cooled from 293 K to 4 K:
- Steel span change: 1,000 mm × 0.30 % = 3.0 mm
- Aluminum span change: 1,000 mm × 0.42 % = 4.2 mm
- Differential: 4.2 mm − 3.0 mm = 1.2 mm over the 1,000 mm span
Assumptions: the full 293 K to 4 K range, which is the upper bound; uniform temperature through each part; no restraint; and the NIST fit errors, which, simply added, put the differential at about 1.2 mm ± 0.3 mm. A fixture that stays well above 4 K contracts less, and the designer reads the actual value at the fixture's cold-case temperature from the same NIST curves. The curves cover 4 K to 300 K only, so a hot plateau above room temperature needs a different data source.
NASA-STD-5005D names CTE mismatch as a material-selection consideration, and its steel clause asks for the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of carbon and low-alloy steels to be considered for hardware exposed to low temperatures, so a cold case also bears on steel selection. ISO 1:2022 sets the standard reference temperature for specifying dimensions, so the drawing tolerances apply at the reference temperature and the cold-case geometry is a calculated condition that the design has to accommodate with slotted, flexure, or pinned-and-sliding joints. As engineering reasoning, a failure mode is an aluminum-to-steel bolted interface that fits at room temperature and binds, slips, or preloads the article at the cold extreme (National Institute of Standards and Technology 2026, Cryogenic Material Properties, 304 SS and 6061-T6 linear expansion; NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6 and §6.3.1.4.1; ISO 1:2022).
How are particles from a fixture's mechanisms kept off precision-cleaned hardware?
In the cleanroom, the fixture's mechanisms are its particle sources. NASA-STD-6016C states that particulate from ground processing can interfere with mechanisms, bearings, and seals, and its requirement MPR 207 has cleanliness levels shown on engineering drawings, covering assembly- and subassembly-level hardware. As engineering reasoning, the same practice on a fixture puts the cleanliness level of each contact surface and mechanism on the drawing rather than in a general note; IEST-STD-CC1246E provides methods for specifying those levels in procurement and design contracts.
Mechanism-level choices also count:
- Lubricant placement. NASA-STD-5005D says lubricant use near precision-cleaned hardware should be minimized or tightly controlled, so greased joints are located below or away from the article, shielded, or replaced with dry-film or coated elements.
- Bearing choice. In the catalog data above, coated bearings emit fewer particles than MoS₂-lubricated ones, which favors them for a mostly-cleanroom fixture.
- Loose items. ECSS-Q-ST-20-08C says loose items on MGSE should be limited by design, and requires loose items and dedicated tools to be unambiguously identified; loose pins, spacers, and shims that can fall or shed are such items.
How the finished fixture's particle emission is assessed for a given cleanroom class is set out in the cleanroom companion article; ISO 14644-14:2026 specifies that assessment method at the level of the standard, and lists requirements on design of equipment and selection of materials among the items to which it is not applicable. As engineering reasoning, a failure mode is a fixture whose structure is cleaned to the agreed level but whose lead screw or open bearing sits above the article and sheds wear debris onto it during every move (NASA-STD-6016C w/Change 1, 2023, §4.2.6.7 [MPR 207]; IEST-STD-CC1246E, 2013; NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6.3.1.5.3; ECSS-Q-ST-20-08C, 2014, §6.2.4; ISO 14644-14:2026).
What sensing and controls does a powered thermal-vacuum or cleanroom fixture need?
A fixture that moves the article under power carries its controls into an environment that limits what can be exposed:
- Drives and cabinets outside. Cabinets, drives, and most electronics stay outside the chamber; every cable, connector, and sensor that goes in is on the declared material list and in the pre-test chamber run.
- Position sensing. Encoders or resolvers on each powered axis report position after a power cycle, and limit switches back them up at the ends of travel; any sensor in the chamber is chosen for its vacuum and temperature range as well as its signal.
- Temperature sensing at mechanisms. Temperature sensors at bearings and screws let the PLC hold motion outside the lubricant's qualified temperature range, which ties the vapor-pressure selection above to an interlock.
- Drives and safe stopping. Allen-Bradley Kinetix 5700 inverters support DSL and Hiperface encoder feedback, with position, velocity, and torque loop axis configurations and a current regulator loop. Their safe torque-off function turns off the output power transistors for a Category 0 stop but, the manual states, does not provide physical isolation of the electrical output that is required for some applications.
- PLC tasks. Logix 5000 controller tasks can be configured as continuous, periodic, or event, and a periodic task executes at a preconfigured interval; logic placed in one evaluates permissives such as bake-complete, vacuum state, and article-secured on a known schedule.
- Pneumatic axes. As NASA practice, NASA-STD-8719.9C requires pneumatically controlled load positioning devices to have a fail-safe check valve that locks up the device on loss of control pressure and a fast-acting safety shutoff valve; a pneumatic fixture axis can borrow both.
- Safety basis. Safety functions such as the emergency stop can run on safety-related parts of the control system designed to ISO 13849-1:2023, and IEC 60204-1:2016 applies to the electrical equipment of machines not portable by hand while working.
UTEC Industrial, a Rockwell Automation Recognized System Integrator, builds UL 508A panels with Allen-Bradley ControlLogix and CompactLogix control and servo drives into the handling equipment it fabricates (Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018), Kinetix 5700; Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025; NASA-STD-8719.9C, 2024, §13.2.2; ISO 13849-1:2023; IEC 60204-1:2016).
Where does a thermal-vacuum fixture sit in the design-to-monitoring chain?
Each link of the chain carries a vacuum or cleanroom consequence:
- Design and engineering. The materials list, lubricant, bearing selection, bake temperature, and cold-case geometry are decided before the drawing is released, because none can be cleaned or inspected in afterward.
- Parts machining. Locating features, slotted joints, and coated contact faces are machined to positions that hold at the reference temperature and accommodate the calculated cold-case differential.
- Fabrication and weld fatigue. Continuous welds leave no crevices to trap contamination, and the frame's fatigue design follows the MGSE practice set out in What Is Mechanical Ground Support Equipment (MGSE) for Aerospace Handling?.
- Stress relief. A welded frame stress-relieved before its interfaces are finish-machined keeps those interfaces where they were machined when it is baked and cycled. UTEC Industrial stress-relieves welded frames in a 6 × 10 × 17 ft car-bottom furnace or with automated vibratory stress relief, then machines interfaces to tolerances as tight as ±0.001 in.
- Drives, controls, and tuning. Axes are tuned with the article's mass on the fixture, and interlocks are proven before the first chamber entry.
- Monitoring. Lubricant replenishment with the approved product only, inspection of separable contacts, and re-bake after any material change are recorded in the fixture's history.
ECSS-Q-ST-20-08C adds a rule for reuse: before generic MGSE is used, or other project-specific MGSE reused, its design authority documents a suitability analysis that includes safety factors, the history log, and the design lifetime among other items. As engineering reasoning, a fixture that served a cleanroom-only campaign and is then proposed for a TVAC campaign warrants that analysis (ECSS-Q-ST-20-08C, 2014, §6.2.3; NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6).
What should a specification for a thermal-vacuum or cleanroom fixture state?
A specification that says only "vacuum compatible" leaves every decision above to the supplier. A complete one states:
- Environment: lowest chamber pressure, temperature range at each mechanism, time in vacuum versus air, and the cleanroom class of each area the fixture enters
- Materials: screening basis and data age, lot-testing requirement for critical materials, and the acceptance limits from the program's contamination documents
- Bakeout: whether the fixture is baked, the bake temperature it must survive, the completion criterion, and which items are removed first
- Lubricants and bearings: dry film or fluid, vapor-pressure requirement relative to the attainable chamber pressure, prohibited lubricant families, and bearing type by vacuum level and temperature
- Contacts: which joints must separate after vacuum exposure, their hardness and coating, and their inspection interval
- Thermal geometry: the cold-case and hot-case temperatures and how each joint accommodates differential expansion
- Cleanliness: contact-surface and mechanism cleanliness levels on the drawings
- Controls: in-chamber sensors and cabling, temperature interlocks, drive and safety-function requirements
- Structure: strength analysis and test as required by safety, and stability verification for applicable configurations, as GSFC-STD-7000B states for ground handling and test fixtures
UTEC Industrial performs factory acceptance testing and on-site commissioning, so functional, interlock, and dimensional checks can be demonstrated before the fixture is cleaned and baked for delivery (GSFC-STD-7000B, 2021, §2.4; ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, 2008, §5.1 a; NASA-STD-6016C w/Change 1, 2023, §4.2.3.6 [MPR 96]; NASA-STD-5005D-2013, §6).
- Cleanroom and ESD Requirements for Handling Equipment — cleanroom classes, outgassing limits, and ESD rules for the whole fixture
- Test-Facility Handling: Thermal-Vacuum and Anechoic Chambers — handling inside thermal-vacuum and anechoic chambers
- What Is Mechanical Ground Support Equipment (MGSE) for Aerospace Handling? — the MGSE family these fixtures belong to
- Gravity-Offload (Zero-G) Deployment Testing for Solar Arrays and Booms — offload rigs whose air pads and covers must suit a cleanroom
- Stiffness-Driven Design and Thermal Expansion in Large Fixtures — thermal expansion effects on large fixtures
References
- NASA. NASA-STD-5005D w/Change 2: Standard for the Design and Fabrication of Ground Support Equipment. NASA, 2013 (Change 2, 2024).
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Outgassing Database User Guide. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2025.
- ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C: Space product assurance — Thermal vacuum outgassing test for the screening of space materials. ECSS Secretariat, ESA-ESTEC, 2008.
- ECSS-Q-ST-70-01C Rev.1: Space product assurance — Cleanliness and contamination control. ECSS Secretariat, ESA-ESTEC, 2025.
- ASTM E595-15(2021): Standard Test Method for Total Mass Loss and Collected Volatile Condensable Materials from Outgassing in a Vacuum Environment. ASTM International, 2015.
- NASA-STD-6016C w/Change 1: Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft. NASA, 2023.
- ASTM E2900-24: Standard Practice for Spacecraft Hardware Thermal Vacuum Bakeout. ASTM International, 2024.
- NASA Glenn Research Center. Space Environments Complex. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2023.
- ECSS-E-ST-33-01C Rev.2: Space engineering — Mechanisms. ECSS Secretariat, ESA-ESTEC, 2019.
- Jones, W.R., Jr.; Jansen, M.J. Lubrication for Space Applications, NASA/CR-2005-213424. NASA Glenn Research Center, 2005.
- Klüber Lubrication. PFPE Products for Extreme Requirements, B990001402 Edition 11.16. Klüber Lubrication München SE & Co. KG, 2016.
- GSFC-STD-7000B: General Environmental Verification Standard (GEVS) for GSFC Flight Programs and Projects. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2021.
- NSK Ltd. Bearings, Ball Screws, and NSK Linear Guides for Special Environments, CAT. No. E1258e. NSK Ltd., 2022.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology. Cryogenic Material Properties. NIST, 2026 (undated web documentation, accessed September 2026).
- ISO 1:2022: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Standard reference temperature for the specification of geometrical and dimensional properties. International Organization for Standardization, 2022.
- IEST-STD-CC1246E: Product Cleanliness Levels – Applications, Requirements, and Determination. Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology, 2013.
- ECSS-Q-ST-20-08C: Space product assurance — Storage, handling and transportation of spacecraft hardware. ECSS Secretariat, ESA-ESTEC, 2014.
- ISO 14644-14:2026: Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 14: Assessment of suitability for use of equipment by airborne particle concentration. International Organization for Standardization, 2026.
- NASA-STD-8719.9C: Lifting Standard. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2024.
- ISO 13849-1:2023: Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems — Part 1: General principles for design. International Organization for Standardization, 2023.
- IEC 60204-1:2016 (Ed. 6.0): Safety of Machinery -- Electrical Equipment of Machines -- Part 1: General Requirements. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2016.
- Rockwell Automation 1756-RM094N-EN-P-2025: Logix 5000 Controllers Design Considerations. Rockwell Automation, 2025.
- Rockwell Automation 2198-UM002E-EN-P (2018): Kinetix 5700 Servo Drives User Manual. Rockwell Automation, 2018.
Ready to Discuss a Material Handling System?
UTEC Industrial designs, engineers, machines, fabricates, and installs custom material handling systems for heavy industry, from the stress-relieved structure and drives to the Allen-Bradley PLC controls, tuning, and monitoring that run them, at its Spokane Valley, WA facility. Send UTEC the application, loads, and duty cycle to start a system review.
Questions? Call (509) 922-1832 or email sales@utec.co